The dangers of nuclear tests
 

Welcome to our nuclear testing Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

Rethinking Workplace Security: How the Rules Have Changed

The workplace has traditionally been a safety and security? In most
dangerous place. Very early in mankind's organizations, no one!I do not advocate
history perils emanated from the place adding yet another layer of bureaucratic
and type of work they performed. Long administration; however, I am stating the
before industrialization, men mined absolute necessity of elevating our
precious metals, gems and fuel in the thinking regarding safety and security to
form of peat and coal hidden beneath the the executive suite. No organization in
earth's surface. Extracting these the over-the-counter medication market
materials brought with it the risk of would think of introducing a new product
cave-ins and being buried alive. without first carefully planning what
Moreover, the quest for the most basic of type of tamper proof packaging would be
all life giving substances, water, could utilized. In many cases this would
also end in sudden death or severe injury include multiple protective steps, such
as well shafts were dug in the soft as glue sealed boxes as an outer package
earth.Industrialization brought with it and then an inner packaging incorporating
new and more interactive dangers to a further visible seal and possibly
workers. Machinery in factories, on inside the bottle cap yet a third tough
farms and aboard steamships maimed and foil seal that the end user must
killed with here-to-for unprecedented puncture. All this for a five dollar
regularity. By the 1800's, campaigns bottle of nonprescription pain reliever,
were already underway throughout the because a decade ago a handful of people
rapidly industrializing world to were poisoned by a tampered
introduce safety regulation and product.Incredibly, many organizations
restrictions on child labor into the today will build new facilities, design
public consciousness, amidst the rapid new processes, introduce products and
growth of potentially deadly machinery. services and enter new marketplaces with
However, it was not until the mid and nary a thought about safety and security
even later 20th century that many of issues until after all of the critical
these measures found full legal and business decisions have already been
societal support in the developed world. made. Only then, as an afterthought, are
To this day, many parts of the developing those who understand the strategic
world still do not protect their workers, breadth and depth of the real safety and
including children, from even the most security issues assigned the task of
blatant workplace dangers.Nor have implementation and often not at a senior
machinery and type of work posed the only enough level to possibly make their
hazards. Workplace violence, whether efforts truly effective.Old Habits Die
instigated by striking workers seeking Hard, But Die They MustIt is time that
collective representation or employers our complacency feathers are ruffled for
attempting to curtail the efforts of good. If September 11th did not
"hotheads" and labor organizers have accomplish this in your organization then
frequently ignited violence in the be ready, because the next crises (and
workplace both for those involved as well there will undoubtedly be a next one)
as those who desired to distance will. Unfortunately, history has proven
themselves from the strife. Arson, without exception that every new weapon
sabotage, intimidation, threats, beatings or mode of destruction ever invented by
and even killings have too often been the man, has always, sooner or later, been
weapons of choice to both sides of put to devastating use. Even the
employment disagreements. Add to this ultimate crushing of the worldwide Al
the mayhem wrought by anarchists, radical Qaeda terrorist organization will not
political factions, competitors and, yes, insulate us from future despots and
guerillas and terrorists. The workplace maniacs. Vigilance is indeed the price
has frequently been a very dangerous of freedom for the citizen and government
place, a fact we often tend to overlook. as well as for the corporate
The need for workplace safety is not organization. September 11th was a
new.Accepting Reality: The first Step to watershed experience. The lesson to be
SecurityToday, we face a new and in some learned from it is not that massive acts
ways, much more complex and potentially of terror are possible, but rather that
far more dangerous scenario. Whether in they have emerged as part of the fabric
the form of a deranged current or former of life worldwide.We must realize that
employee armed with automatic weapons or what we have already experienced is not
terrorists with their meticulously the upper limit of what is possible or
planned and well funded covert even likely. Executive planners must
operations, either attack can be just as anticipate that as long as purely evil
surprising and the carnage every bit as people still exist anywhere on the face
real and terrifying. To counter these of the earth, at some point we will face
threats, along with the full spectrum of even more catastrophic events, possibly
more insidious, if less spectacular much larger on both a geographic and
dangers, we must understand and human scale, as well as in the resultant
acknowledge the dangers as well as long term effects of economic disruption.
establish appropriate preventative Armed with the explosion of technology
responses. We must also accept that we and our rapidly increasing reliance upon
can never adequately guard against every that technology in our homes, autos and
eventuality. To believe that we can make workplaces, just a few determined
the workplace completely "safe" is to individuals can at least temporarily
deny reality. There will always be bring a nation or continent to a
insufficient resources available to be standstill and inflict untold
committed for security purposes to make devastation.New Paradigms Require New
this dream possible. Furthermore, given Ways of RespondingGiven this new
the freedoms, privacy and civil liberties paradigm, everyone involved in
we so cherish, people today will not leadership, whether a safety and security
accept the regimen of restrictive and specialist or not, must commit these
totalitarian measures necessary for any issues to the forefront of their
attempt to ensure absolute security. In strategic thinking. To do so will
fact, even if such measures could be require a high level of personal and
implemented, they would undoubtedly organizational discipline. Other, more
trigger a new round of violence, on the urgent issues can easily crowd out longer
part of those incensed by such invasive range strategic concerns, especially with
tyranny.Given the fact that we cannot no new threats or attacks to rivet our
guarantee freedom from any and all acts attention and compel immediate responses.
of violence, sabotage and other misdeeds, When confronted with stark resource
the question becomes how are we to ensure limitations, we must be careful not to
the greatest possible measure of reduce our commitment to the generally
workplace safety and security for both "unseen" activities that comprise a well
our employees and the organization? To conceived and systematically implemented
properly respond to this question we must strategic, organization wide safety and
rethink our fundamental attitudes toward security commitment.Moreover, if we are
security. What are the primary threats? to take this commitment seriously and not
How far does the organization's just pay it the lip service traditionally
responsibility extend? It is certain accorded in most organizations, we must
that some trial lawyers seeking massive above all forever leave behind us the
damage awards for the families of airline "old school of thought" which relegated
victims will attempt to assert that the the issue to treatment as an
carriers bear greater responsibility for afterthought. Instead, we must create so
failure to properly screen passengers pervasive an awareness throughout our
prior to the September 11th attacks. organizations, that everyone thinks
However, do the airlines have an systemically about safety and security.
obligation to go beyond federally By systemically, I mean from the very
mandated standards? And if so, at what roots of the organization to its most far
point would these same lawyers argue that reaching operations, from strategic
the airlines interfere with passenger planning to the daily conduct of the most
rights of privacy and freedom from racial basic activities. It must be as much a
or ethnic profiling?We Must First top-of-the-mind priority for the senior
Radically Change Our ThinkingToday, executives gathered at an offsite retreat
safety and security must no longer be planning the organization's future, as it
viewed as add on services, afterthoughts is for the janitorial and maintenance
to the way we operate. Instead, we must staff who are ever watchful for the
think strategically as to how these goals suspicious package or security door left
are to become pervasive in all of our ajar.Our thinking and awareness must be
planning and operations scenarios. For equally multidimensional when it comes to
example, in those organizations that thoroughly assessing all of the avenues
employ security services, whether of threat and how best to combat them.
employees or contractor staff, to what In America today we are keenly aware of
management level is the decision making the threat of explosive bombs, but what
responsibility for the overall scope of about "cyber" bombs in the form of
these services delegated? Is this and maliciously planted computer programs
other safety and security functions fused to detonate at a predetermined time
included in the strategic planning event or the "employee or ex-employee"
activities of the executive leadership? bomb, unstable, seething with hostility
Probably not, unless the facility in and armed on an emotional hair-trigger to
question is a nuclear power plant and extract vengeance against the entire
recent news reports indicate that even organization, executives, supervisors and
some of those corporations did not give co-workers alike.Today we must view our
this issue the strategic weight that it world not from a mindset of paranoia, but
should be accorded.Safety and security rather a realism and awareness of the
are not band-aids to be applied at a very multitude of opportunities and
junior level of the organization. conversely, the ever present dangers that
Instead, every executive should include surround us. The appropriate response is
these considerations as important neither denial nor paralysis, but rather
elements of their daily decision making a steadfast determination to pursue our
processes. I venture that if you are in future with every ounce of vigor we can
a public company, every significant muster, while at the same time
decision is weighed beforehand at least understanding how each strategic decision
in part by what the response will be from will impact the safety and security of
the analysts and shareholders. Likewise, the public, our organization and its
any major new corporate initiative is people.Copyright 2005 by John Di
reviewed by the legal department before FrancesJohn Di Frances is an
public announcement. But who with the internationally
requisite knowledge and experience recognized organizational
"speaks" at the executive level to your legacy expert and professional
organization's specific concerns of speaker.




www.studycommittee.org keyword stats [2007-08-19-2007-08-19]



Daily top traffic source : MSN
Most current MSN search phrases:

who invented the nuclear bomb footage of nuclear explosions


Other search engines trends:



Other search phrases:

dating nuclear crisis in north korea
Soviet atomic bomb test nuclear power plant florida
iran north korea nuclear operating nuclear power plants
united states nuclear stockpile Most current nuclear bomb tests in New
north korean nuclear bomb Pros about Yucca Mountain
nuclear weapons of the united states effect of nuclear testing
did the united states use atomic china nuclear test google"how to make
nuclear power plant output united states and india nuclear
is a nuclear stress test united states use of nuclear weapons
nuclear stress test cost nuclear non proliferation treaty north
x ray warning sign soviet nuclear testing videosyucca
nuclear power plants in california north korea nuclear bomb testing
nuclear bomb test





1 - A - B - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56 - 57 -