Why Not Reprocess Nuclear Fuel?

One of the related reasons helping to drive thenuclear fuel which results in the separation of
current uranium bull market higher is theplutonium." By April 1977, Carter issued his edict
"once-through" use of uranium. The world's largestindefinitely "deferring" the commercial reprocessing
commercial consumers of U3O8 are the U.S.of uranium. Carter wanted to bury the nuclear
utilities. Because of government policies establishedwaste. This has led to the present problem of
thirty years ago, the U.S. nuclear reactors maywhere to deposit about 30 years of nuclear
not reprocess its uranium. Each spent control rodwaste. Instead of recycling the nuclear fuel rods,
contains about 95 to 97 percent of unusedwe are now faced with decisions about where to
uranium. Imagine if you were only allowed to usebury nuclear waste. President Reagan lifted the
5 percent of the gasoline in your tank to powerban in 1981, but in the post-TMI years, there was
your automobile. You would be legally bound tolittle interest in reprocessing. President Clinton in
drain the remaining 95 percent of the gasoline1995 proceeded in a joint venture with Russian
from your car, store it and then refresh yourgovernment to dispose of plutonium from surplus
tank with new gasoline. Again, you could only usenuclear weapons, called the HEU program.
5 percent of that gasoline.Ironically, France, Japan and the United Kingdom
Under these political circumstances, U.S. utilitiesreprocess their used nuclear fuel by utilizing the
must continuously acquire fresh supplies oftechnology developed in the United States. Over
uranium. A large-scale Generation III nuclearthe past forty years, more than 75,000 metric
power plant will reportedly consume 30 milliontons of used nuclear fuels have been reprocessed.
pounds of uranium oxide over its proposedFrance has reprocessed more than 10,000 metric
sixty-year operating life. When the 104 licensedtons of used reactor fuel. The United Kingdom
Generation II nuclear reactors are replaced withhas reprocessed more than 15,000 metric tons.
the next generation of reactors, U.S. utilities canReprocessing extends the life of the uranium as a
look forward to acquiring more than 3 billionnuclear fuel. After five or six cycles, the remaining
pounds of uranium to operating those plants. Toplutonium can no longer be used. By recycling the
worsen matters, these same utilities will beuranium and plutonium within a metric ton of used
competing with others across the globe, whichreactor fuel, utilities are getting the equivalent of
also want uranium to power their nuclear energythe energy from 100,000 barrels of oil.
programs.Instead, U.S. utilities are given a bizarre alternative
The Generation IV nuclear reactor designs mayto reprocessing. Spent fuel rods are stored in
help solve the problem. The problem ofnuclear fuel storage pools of water. Instead of
reprocessing stems from worries about plutoniumreprocessing the used nuclear fuel, it must now
falling into the hands of terrorists. In May 1974,be safely stored. The ongoing national debate
India detonated a nuclear device. The device wasabout nuclear waste disposal, and whether or not
constructed from plutonium separated at itsto utilize Yucca Mountain, can also find its roots in
reprocessing facility. The Indians had obtainedthe political decision made during the 1976 U.S.
plutonium from an insecure Canadian researchpresidential election.
reactor.U.S. utilities are currently held hostage from all
Then-presidential candidate James Earl Carter wassides: (a) provide a cleaner source of energy to a
opposed to recycling plutonium. He debatedgrowing appetite for electricity; (b) don't
then-President Gerald Ford about the evils ofreprocess spent fuel rods, but instead burden the
reprocessing. This election also took place duringuranium miners to obtain a fresh supply of
the high point of the 1970s uranium bull market.uranium for their re-fueling cycles; (c) dispose of
President Ford blinked and issued a 1976 policythe nuclear waste in new and inventive ways (dry
statement, "The avoidance of proliferation mustcask shortage to alleviate the rising storage
take precedence over economic interests." Hepools); (d) build newer and safer nuclear reactors.
changed the domestic policies of theOnce-through has created numerous problems for
"commercialization of chemical reprocessing ofU.S. utilities, and ultimately for every American.