What North Korea Really Wants

Conventional geopolitical thinking has long assumedby North Korea. At the same time, as U.S. forces
that North Korea has pursued an unrelentingwould not be impacted by possible hostilities and
campaign of provocations, its illicit nuclearthere no longer would be a binding U.S.
program, and even a nuclear weapons test withcommitment to defend South Korea, the U.S.
the objective of assuring the survival of itswould have far less legal basis to come to South
current regime. Toward that end, an exasperatedKorea's assistance. Moreover, a bilateral
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently toldnon-aggression agreement would make such
CNN, "there is no intention to invade or attackintervention illegal. This reality would greatly bolster
them. So they have that guarantee... I don't knowNorth Korea's diplomatic leverage.
what more they want." It is that "more" thatAt present, North Korea's leadership has
North Korea wants that is really driving Northconcluded that events in the Middle East, South
Korea's actions. North Korea wants the U.S. toAsia, and East Africa have increased its
withdraw its forces from South Korea, end itsopportunity to transform the geopolitical playing
military obligations to the South, and ultimately,field in its favor, with or without the support of
Korean reunification on its terms.the international community. In 2003, Joseph Nye,
North Korea has long sought to reunify and placeDean of Harvard University's Kennedy School of
the Korean Peninsula under its totalitarian rule. OnGovernment trumpeted, "If anyone doubted the
June 25, 1950 it launched an invasion of Southoverwhelming nature of U.S. military power, Iraq
Korea only to have its forces rolled back bysettled the issue... Not since Rome has one nation
massive U.S. intervention. Ultimately, followingloomed so large above the others." Three years
Chinese, and to a lesser extent, Sovietlater, North Korea sees only weakness. U.S.
intervention in the conflict, the boundary betweenforces in Iraq appear hapless in the face of a
the two Koreas was set at the 38th Parallel.50,000-man insurgency, the Taliban is waging a
Since then, North Korea has persisted in its callcomeback in Afghanistan, and radical Islamists
for reunification. Under Kim Jong-il, that call foraffiliated with Al Qaeda have "bagged" Somalia
reunification has grown more urgent. North Koreawith no U.S. response whatsoever. Furthermore,
sees Korean reunification as "the call of history,"North Korea sees the United States as "isolated"
North Korea's Korean Central News Agencyin the world community. In contrast, North Korea
(KCNA) explained on January 11, 1999. "For thebelieves it enjoys world support. "Kim Jong-il has
Korean nation, nothing is more important thandedicated himself to the human cause of
national reunification and no task is more urgentindependence for a long time," KCNA declared,
than it," KCNA added. On October 4, 2006, KCNA"The [world's] progressive people repose absolute
declared, "To achieve the reunification of thetrust in him."
country is the most urgent task facing theAt a time when it is unimpressed with U.S. military
Korean nation."capabilities and sees only U.S. weakness, North
Kim Jong-il and his government believe they areKorea believes it is invincible. On October 10,
the ones who will bring about Korean reunification.KCNA boasted, "The single-minded unity of the
On August 5, 2002, KCNA reported, "NationalDPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] in
reunification is sure to come under the leadershipthe Songun [strong military-centered state] era
of Kim Jong-il, the sun of the 21st century andrepresents an indestructible harmonious whole in
the lodestar of national reunification."which the army and the people are closely united...
When discussing its pursuit of reunification, NorthIt is growing ever stronger... The single-minded
Korea employs often soothing language. Onunity of our party and army is unbreakable." The
January 7, 1999 KCNA explained, "To achieve thenews agency also proclaimed, "Our party will
great unity of the whole nation is a decisivealways demonstrate its might as an indestructible
guarantee for the independent and peacefulparty that remains unshaken in any storm and
reunification of the fatherland."stress and a militant party capable of doing
There is nothing reassuring about North Korea'sanything..."
calls for reunification. Rather, North Korea isIf North Korea largely escapes vigorous sanctions
borrowing from Cold War Era propaganda effortson account of its nuclear test, and odds favor
that were aimed at dividing Western popularsuch an outcome, North Korea's perception that it
opinion. For example, a declassified memorandumis in a position of being "capable of doing anything"
to the director of the CIA issued on Decemberwill only be bolstered. That will likely lead to an
21, 1961 observed of the USSR, "The peacefuleven more defiant and provocative North Korea.
coexistence line, far from being an abandonmentGiven international events and its own balance of
of Soviet expansionist goals, is a tacticalpowers calculations, North Korea is now stepping
prescription considerably more effective than theup its campaign to eliminate the presence of U.S.
compound of heavy-handedness and isolationismforces on the Korean Peninsula. That is the real
which was Stalin's foreign policy."story behind its recent nuclear test. "The Koreans
At closer inspection, the fangs of North Korea'sshould force the U.S. imperialist aggressor forces,
totalitarian dictatorship are barely concealed.the very source of war, to quit South Korea as
"South Korea should not depend on the outsideearly as possible," North Korean newspaper
forces, but take the way for reunification throughRodong Sinmun recently declared. "The U.S. forces
alliance with communism and the north," KCNApresent in South Korea are a stumbling block lying
advised on January 4, 1999. An "alliance within the way of...solving the issue of the country's
communism" would mean that South Korea wouldreunification independently by the concerted
be required to embrace North Korea's totalitarianefforts of the Koreans," KCNA stated on October
system. The January 7, 1999 KCNA report added,4. KCNA also asserted, "The U.S. policy of military
"The five-point policy as well as the 10-Pointoccupation of South Korea is a policy of
Program of the Great Unity of the Whole Nationenslavement to all intents and purposes. The U.S.
put forward by President Kim Il Sung are thehas interfered in all internal affairs of South Korea
banner the entire nation should uphold and theranging from the installing of the 'government' to
political program of great unity they mustshaping its policies and their implementation to
invariably defend and realize without fail." Later, onserve its purpose of aggression... It is the
March 8, 2003, KCNA predicted, "All the Koreansunanimous will and ardent desire of the Koreans
in the north, the south and abroad will work hardto drive the U.S. imperialist aggressor forces out
to accomplish the cause of national reunificationof South Korea..."
under Kim Jong-il's steermanship and thus glorifySo long as North Korea's paramount objective
[the] dignity and honor of Kim Il Sung's nation."remains Korean reunification on its terms, it
What is most revealing in this statement is thatcontinues to view the U.S. commitment to South
North Korea, not South Korea, would be "glorified"Korea as thwarting that ambition, and it believes
by reunification.the U.S. is weakening--a failure for the U.S. to
At present, it is the collision of this North Koreanbring about a stiff international sanctions regime
ambition and the U.S.-South Korean alliance that iswill further confirm the idea that the U.S. is
driving North Korea's foreign policy in stiff defianceweakening--North Korea is not likely to alter its
of the will of the United Nations and North Korea'spresent course. Economic inducements or security
neighbors. North Korea is seeking to transformguarantees that fail to address North Korea's
the environment to the point where it possessesbasic aspirations will hold little sway. North Korea
the leverage to bring an end to the Koreanonly wants an arrangement that would lead to the
Armistice Agreement of 1953 and can negotiatewithdrawal of U.S. forces from South Korea and
reunification to its own terms.an end to the U.S.-South Korean military alliance.
In place of the existing Armistice Agreement,Anything else will do little to change North Korea's
North Korea seeks a "non-aggression pact" thatbehavior. As a result, there is little likelihood of
would mandate the withdrawal of U.S. forcesmeaningful breakthroughs anytime soon. Instead,
from South Korea and terminate the U.S.-SouthNorth Korea will likely continue its nuclear buildup,
Korea military pact. Then, South Korea would becarry out additional missile and nuclear tests, and
rendered far more vulnerable to a possible attacklaunch fresh provocations.