Uranium Bull Market: Only Tip of the Iceberg

">development sector is the lack of proven miners.
In mid September, Mitchell Dong, chief investmentOver the past year, a few existing U.S. uranium
officer of Solios Asset Management told a newsproducers experienced employee raids by the
wire service, "I think we are seeing the tip of thenewly arrived development companies. We
iceberg of financial investors entering the physicalsuspect more will take place, as several
uranium market." At the Platts Nuclear Fuelcompanies move closer to the mine development
Strategies conference in Washington, this paststage. Raids are taking place because of a lack of
week, Mitchell Dong was a pit bull. Not only did heskilled and proven personnel.
take extensive notes during the speeches, but hePatricia Mohr brought up another of many
was first-in-line to question the majority of theinteresting points. Increased mining output during
speakers after their presentations.2004 and 2005, but in the first half of 2006 Mohr
Clearly, whatever initial purchases his fund orobserved, "Mine production probably dropped in
funds had made, in entering the physical uraniumthe first half of 2006." She believes production
and equities markets, he probably wasn't finishedwas about 20 percent of companies planned. She
loading up. Nearby, a trio of Greenwich,pointed out Australia's Ranger mine production
Connecticut hedge fund managers quietly listenedwas lower because of a cyclone; Olympic Dam
to the presentations. Later, they lunched alone atbecause of declining ore grades. Rugged granite,
their table while we observed them huddled infrom which Namibian uranium is mined, has
deep discussions about what bets they mightreportedly caused problems at this country's
place in the uranium bull market.Rossing mine. Mohr believes the mine's output
Long-time insiders have kept trying to put this bullcould slow down in the second half of the year.
market into whatever context they could. AWe believe the production costs for many of the
difficult task since many of them endured aup-and-coming projects are going to be greater
twenty-plus-year uranium drought, which onlythan expected. When was the last time a new
came out of hibernation the past few years.uranium mill was built? Not in this century. When
Some admitted they had nearly given up on thewas the last great uranium deposit discovered?
sector as the years passed by. Now, they andTwenty years ago. How does a new company
everyone else involved is trying to figure out howcalculate its start-up and operating mining and
to make the Big Score on this amazing nuclearmilling costs in today's dollars? Some might believe
renaissance.they know the answer, but we won't really know
Of course there were opposing views on how tountil the actual production scenario takes place.
deal with the uranium price. Charles Peterson, anAnd that might be two years down the road at
attorney at DC-based Pillsbury Winthrop Shawthe very earliest. Factors such as those do puzzle
Pittman LLP, hinted at a more transparentthe forecasters, the analysts and the industry
market, hoping uranium might be offered on ainsiders. They truly do not have a proven
future exchange. He compared to the accessibilitybenchmark against which to make an accurate
of other metals where traders use speculators.evaluation. The last time they could was during
Later in the day, Patricia Mohr, Vice President forthe uranium bull market of the 1970s.
Economics, at Canada's Scotiabank warned theWhat about those 400 uranium companies? "Do
industry that if uranium were traded on a futuresyou read their news releases?" asked Nancy Roth.
market, its volatility might already have it tradingShe does, we read many of them. "Aren't most
at $100/pound.of them just hype?" she inquired. We had to
Again, the uranium price worried many at theagree with her assessment. But in understanding
conference. Ending the HEU hung around at thethe junior uranium companies, it is the news
back of the minds of utility executives probablyrelease which attracts investors to provide
because many wondered where future SWUmarket support for their stock prices. Some have
would come from, should the Russians terminateno real plans but to mine the stock market, as
supplies to U.S. utilities. Should preparations not beauthor and long-time uranium insider Julian Steyn
taken at this time, it would not surprise us to seeonce told us. Over dinner, Ms. Roth provided us
a super-spike in the price of uranium which Sprottwith an important insight. She covers the NRC
Asset Management's Kevin Bambrough hashearings for various companies hoping to move
occasionally warned us about. U.S. utilities remaintheir projects forward. Those who are actually
complacent, assured the Department of Energymeeting with NRC aren't doing so for a free trip
will come to the rescue at the last minute. But willto Washington at the expense of their
they?shareholders, but instead to bring their project
On the outside chance we might get insights intointo the mine development stage. Among the
the complex and secretive Russian mind, wemost recent applicants were some of our
cornered Andrey A. Orekhov, counselor for thefavorites, such as Uranerz Energy (AMEX: URZ),
Science and Technology Department at theUR-Energy (TSX: URE) and Energy Metals (TSX:
Embassy of the Russian Federation. He brieflyEMC). Another was the privately held Concentric
attended the conference to eavesdrop on whatEnergy Corp.
Ronald Lorentzen, Director of the Office of PolicyCoincidentally, StockInterview fan Laura Stein had
within the U.S. Department of Commerce, had tobeen emailing us to meet with Ralph Kettell, Chief
say at his presentation with regards to ongoingExecutive of Concentric Energy. Because of Ms.
Russo-U.S. negotiations. We tested the waters byStein's insistence, and our review of Mr. Kettell,
talking about the new generation of nuclearwe met with him about his project. Aptly, he
reactors, and brashly asking him if he couldchose the Greenbelt exit on the
introduce us to Sergei Kirienko, head of Russia'sBaltimore-Washington Parkway. For those
atomic energy agency, Rosatom. Instead heunfamiliar with this exit, it is the road to NASA. As
referred us to a lesser light for an interview.an electrical engineer, it was for NASA that Kettell
Then, we asked him if we had been accurate indesigned the radio frequency (RF) portion of the
reporting that Russia's aggressive nuclearSpace to Space Communications System used in
ambitions would drive the uranium price to $100the construction of the International Space
pound. Pondering our question for a while, as ifStation. Kettell also likes to seriously dabble in
weighing whether the wrong answer would leadnatural resource stocks, having been the lead
to his next meal in a Russian prison, Orekhovinvestor and a director in AuEx Ventures.
looked off into a far corner of the room andNo stranger to the uranium market, he had
responded, "Who knows?"written an article for a resource website in 2003,
His question concisely summarized the collectiveproclaiming the coming bull market in uranium.
thoughts of the conference. No one really knowsKettell forecast that some of his favorite stock
how much higher the price of uranium will run,picks, such as Strathmore Minerals - then trading
whether it will reach $100/pound (and higher) andfor about C$0.30/share, would jump by 1000
how soon it might arrive at the century mark. Aspercent. Strathmore's 2006 high was C$3.00.
we noted in an earlier part of this series, DustinKettell had created an index of five uranium
Garrow remarked of a possible run to the $80 tostocks (there weren't 400 to choose from, back
$100/pound level. The Florida Power and Lightin 2003) from which he started at a base number
spokesman believed $52/pound was too high.of 100. Kettel's favorite stocks were Cameco
Renaissance Could Hit a WallCorp (NYSE: CCJ), Denison (TSX: DEN),
Garrow made an interesting point at the beginningInternational Uranium Corp (TSX: IUC), JNN
of his presentation, announcing, "There are nowResources (TSX: JNR) and Strathmore Minerals
more than 400 uranium companies." The(TSX: STM). He told us this past spring, the value
implications of his comment are wide-rangingof his index had soared to the 3,000 level - up 30
should one pause to ponder what he meant. Fueltimes from when he began tracking his favorite
Cycle Week senior editor Nancy Roth addresseduranium stocks. Since then, the index had dropped
this in the October 3rd issue. She reported uponto 2,200. We asked him in which direction he
the events and revelations at the Plattsbelieved it was heading next. He responded, "I've
conference, writing, "Several speakers mentionedlooked at the technicals (technical analysis), and it
serious technology and equipment deficits that areshould blow through the 3,000 level in 2007."
a legacy of this dormant period (the uraniumBy early 2007, Kettell believes his private
depression: 1980 - 2003), along with the dearth ofcompany, Concentric Energy, should be publicly
nuclear personnel from uranium miners to nucleartrading. He told us he had rounded up the support
engineers."of Jim Dines, Doug Casey and other newsletter
These observations swipe at both sides: uraniumwriters for his private placement stock. Kettell
producers and utility end-users of the uranium. Ifsaid Pinetree Capital (TSX: PNP) was one
the labor and equipment shortages fail to provideinstitution backing his project. His company plans
sufficient uranium for utilities, then the price isto develop the Anderson uranium mine, about 75
likely to rise much higher. At the same time,miles northwest of Phoenix, Arizona. The property
should nuclear power plants fail to staff up theirhad produced about 33,000 pounds in the 1950s.
operations, or construction delays impact theAdditional exploration by Unocal and
building of new reactors, a lesser quantity ofUrangesellschaft in the late 1970s demonstrated
supply, less than what has been projected, will besufficient promise in the property. He told us
required.Unocal was planning a 2,000-ton-day mill in 1978
To make it short and simple: this industry is stillfor a proposed open pit mine.
too 'new' to realize all of the complicationsWe mention this meeting to bring home a very
required to move forward. As Ms. Roth wrote instrong point about the future price of uranium.
an email to us, "I think the uranium industry has aUpon our asking Mr. Kettell what his operating
real chicken-and-egg problem in reinventing itself,costs for the milling and mining operations at the
and I think a key indicator of the severity of theAnderson property, he told us, "About $65
problem might be in these production costs." Thepound." At least he was honest. This may not be
cost to which she was referring was the expensethe price level U.S. utilities want to hear about, but
required to extract uranium from the ground. Init might become the floor price for the future
the United States, there are a handful of in situprice of uranium. Perhaps, Mr. Kundalkar, the vice
recovery operations. That is an insufficientpresident from Florida Power and Light whom we
number to adequately calculate an averagementioned during the first article in this series,
production cost for a mining operation.should pay attention to what the uranium miners
What happens when another half dozen uraniumare saying. We are.
properties commence new mining operations?COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc.
One of the hidden problems within the uraniumALL RIGHTS RESERVED.