The Nuclear Deal - Why America is Proactive to 'Help' India

The Bush administration is visibly workingcompanies for setting up nuclear plants in India.
overtime to finalize the nuclear deal with India.Just look at the following list:
There are many indications that president George(a) In civil construction: Larsen & Toubro
Bush is personally pursuing the deal to get it pass(L&T), Hindustan Construction Company
in the September session of the US Congress.(HCC) and Gammon India;
However, there are different voices within the US(b) In boilers: L&T in reactors; Bharat Heavy
administration about how much America willEngineering Ltd (BHEL);
benefit from it. There is also the non-proliferation(c) In boiler feed pumps: KSB, Kirloskar Brothers,
lobby constantly campaigning against the deal. TheMather & Platt, Jyoti Ltd. and Bharat Pumps;
Bush administration is arguing that the deal will be(d) In heat exchangers: Alpha Laval, GEI Hammon
a foundation of closed strategic relationship with aPipes, Maharashtra Seamless and Ratnamani
democratic and 'economically vibrant' friendlyMetals;
country that significantly shares its border with(e) In panels: Honeywell Automation;
China.(f) In consulting and engineering services: Rolta
Non-proliferation groups are saying that the dealIndia.
would ruin global efforts to stop the spread ofSource: India Knowledge Wharton
atomic weapons and boost India's nuclear arsenal.American hegemony and the nuclear deal
Democratic Representative of Massachusetts EdBy building a close strategic tie-up with India,
Markey, a leading critic of the deal, said that theWashington will firmly position itself into the heart
Bush administration is pressuring the Internationalof the Asian subcontinent. All neighboring countries
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Nuclearwill soon start sensing the American hegemony
Suppliers Group (NSG) for quick approval of thefrom close. Then there are the significant
deal, which will compromise the integrity of theadvantages in a perpetuated future conflict by
review process of the deal's non-proliferationgeographically positioning closer to China. India will
implications.be more valuable as a friendly nuclear state in this
'The Economist' in its 23 August 2007 issue raisedscenario. Washington is continually trying to
alarm on the Bush administration's readiness,influence New Delhi to tune its foreign policy with
"Among other dangerous loopholes, some ofUS global strategies; the nuclear deal will work as
which have widened since Congress gave itsa wonderful catalyst in this respect. The added
conditional go-ahead to the deal in December,advantage will be that in near future the US could
India is pointedly not taking on the obligations andgreatly increase their influence on economic
practices of the official five. Unlike them, it haspolicies of the Indian government as well. US
refused to sign the test-ban treaty. Unlike them, itmilitary's immediate goal is to start a constructive
declines to end the production of fissilemilitary cooperation program hosted from Indian
material-uranium and plutonium-for bombs." It alsosoil, jointly with its allies, involving India.
says, "China, unhappy at America's coddling ofThe Chinese newspaper 'People's Daily'
India, is exploring more nuclear cooperation withcommented that, "In fact the purpose of the US
Pakistan-which in turn threatens to match India,to sign civilian nuclear energy cooperation with
should it step up weapons production or testIndia is to enclose India into its global partners'
again."camp, so as to balance the forces of Asia." In
The critics say that contrary to the claims of itsSeptember 2005, the Indian Government had
advocates, the deal fails to bring India further intodisplayed its loyalty by voting twice against Iran in
conformity with the nonproliferation behaviorthe IAEA after the US asked them to do so.
expected of the member states of the nuclearSenator Luger of the Senate Foreign Relations
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Unlike 178 otherCommittee praised India's initiative by stating, "We
countries, India has not signed the Comprehensivehave already seen strategic benefits from our
Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).improving relations with India. India's votes at the
Then why is the US so eagerly interested? ThereIAEA on the Iran issue last September and this
are two primary reasons.past February demonstrate that New Delhi is able
The business economics of the nuclear dealand willing to adjust its traditional foreign policies
American economy in general is looking forand play a constructive role on international
greater business opportunities in the 'liberalized'issues."
Indian economy of today. International MonetaryIndia and the US had already signed a ten year
Fund (IMF) has projected a slow economic growthagreement 'New Framework for India-US Defense
rate for the US economy which is expected toRelationship' earlier on June 2005 where various
register a growth rate of only 0.5% in 2008,military issues like joint military exercises, joint
compared to a strong growth rate in India,planning, joint operations in other countries, and
forecasted to be above 8%. India is one of thedefense procurement between the two countries
fastest growing economies of the world. As thehave been included. It seems likely that the civilian
American economy is moving slowly, countries likenuclear cooperation pact comes in exchange with
China and India provides fertile territory for US,this defense agreement. The agreement started
the largest economy in the world to invest forrolling with the joint military exercises between
high returns. The free market economy isthe two countries in the Kalaikunda air base in
therefore demanding more liberalized proceduresWest Bengal. Another agreement called "The
in India and any obstacle in this regard isLogistics and Service Agreement" will allow
considered negative to the free market notion.refueling and complete access facilities to all US
Creating a favorable political atmosphere isships and aircraft in Indian waterfront.
therefore a necessity in this context. It isStrategic partnership between the two countries
understandable why Dr. Manmohan Singh, thewould be favorable to counteract China's strategic
'chief architect' of 'liberalized' India, a former IMFcapabilities and 'Chinese hegemony' in the South
man, is so dear to Mr. Bush.Asia region. Ms. Condoleezza Rice had earlier made
The strategic relationship between Delhi andit clear when she affirmed the strategic
Washington after the Indo-US nuclear deal willpartnership as, "a platform of partnerships that will
result big business for US nuclear suppliers, whichenable America to advance its interests and its
would be around $150 billion worth of contractsvalues in this dynamic region for years to come."
according to estimates from the U.S.-IndiaThere is another important aspect - the
Business Council (USIBC). US nuclear companiesIndia-Pakistan relations. As M.K. Bhadrakumar in a
will be able to sell both reactors as well as nuclearrecent article has noted,
technology to India. The nuclear industry in the US"From Washington's perspective, harmonizing
presently is going through a stagnant phase as noIndia-Pakistan relations makes the U.S. the
new commercial nuclear reactor had come up inpredominant power in South Asia. It has serious
the past ten years. For one of the largest nuclearimplications for Asian security as well as for the
industries in the world, this situation is definitelyPersian Gulf and Central Asia. The fallout on
grave. Therefore, if the Indo-US nuclear deal getsAfghanistan can only be helpful. The U.S. diplomacy
through it will have a stimulating effect on the USwill become optimal. It makes a fine legacy."
nuclear industry, which is expected to gainHere also, money matters has influenced heavily.
substantially from the emerging Indian nuclearAn estimate shows that India will spend $70 billion
market. Sensing this money-spinning option, thein defense procurements in the next five years.
US nuclear business lobby is applying all theirIndia's long-term purchase plans are highly
influences and contacts to get a smooth passageattractive to the US defense industries. It is not
for the deal. In 2006, two US business delegationswithout cause that companies like Boeing were
visited India looking to sell Westinghouse nuclearfound lobbying the US Congress to smoothen the
reactors and uranium from South Dakota. In thenuclear deal path. If the deal rolls, Government of
next year when the largest ever US businessIndia could be influenced further for US defense
delegation visited India, 50 out of 250 delegatescontracts to push back Russia, who is India's
among them were nuclear manufacturers. Asbiggest defense supplier today. In future, India
stated by a Bloomberg News report, "Areva, themay also start launching satellites carrying U.S.
world's largest maker of nuclear power stations,components. India has already entered in the
and General Electric, are among four companiesbusiness of space launches and satellite fabrication.
poised to share $14 billion of orders from India."The availability of high-skilled talent at a lower cost
There are interests extended by big Indianmay reduce 30 percent costs of the US space
companies also. According to the Tata Grouplaunch programs.
chairman Ratan Tata, Tata Power is certainlyConclusion
interested in operating a nuclear power plant.The civilian nuclear cooperation agreement will
Other interested parties are the Anilhave a huge overall effect on the economic,
Ambani-controlled Reliance Energy (Anil Ambani ispolitical and social life of the country and its people
very close to Samajwadi Party's Amar Singh whoand therefore ought to be studied and analyzed
has made a volte-face to announce support forfrom all possible angles. It is a perilous agreement
the Manmohan Singh government after the Leftwith hidden dangers which the Left parties tried
withdrew support), the Essar Group and the GMRto explore and explain to the entire nation - not
Group. Anil Kakodkar, the Atomic Energyas anti-Americans but as true patriots. The nation
Commission chairman has already made the Indianis more interested to follow the scrumptious daily
government's plan clear when in 2007 he said thatdevelopments of political vulgarism and sadly,
the Atomic Energy Act would be amended verydedicated to defend the great Prime Minister for
soon to allow private-sector participation. Thereholding the nation's status to an 'all time high'
are also contender companies eagerly interestedwithout knowing the full truth.
to provide local support as contractors to US