The Hypocrisy Surrounding Nuclear Weapons

The UN Security Council has today announced‘rogue’ states, such as North Korea or
that it has voted unanimously to impose newIran, do not and, therefore, simply cannot be
sanctions on North Korea which, in addition totrusted. This, however, is not necessarily true:
tighter bans on arms exports and greater powerssince the Second World War, the USA has been
to inspect North Korean ships, include ‘financialinvolved in more wars than any other country
measures’ (at this point, however, the typeand, together with the UK, is currently involved in
of financial measures are not clear). Thesetwo armed conflicts: Afghanistan and Iraq. The
developments are a reaction to Northformer, of course, is a war that was built on a
Korea’s nuclear tests last month which havepack of lies: that Iraq owned weapons of mass
led to the excoriation of its actions around thedestruction which could be launched in under 45
globe.minutes. Not only did no WMDs exist in Iraq, but
It is strange, however, that the hypocrisy of thethe greatest irony of all is that if Iraq did own
UN Security Council is largely ignored by thenuclear weapons then neither the US nor the UK
mainstream media. Every permanent member ofwould have invaded the country in the first place.
the Security Council boasts huge stockpiles ofAnd what of the sanctions which are to be
thermonuclear weapons. Moreover, one memberimposed? History tells us that these sanctions do
of the Security Council is, hitherto, the onlylittle to punish a respective regime but, instead,
country on the planet to use a nuclear weapon.have deleterious effects on the most vulnerable
Indeed, the USA has not only used nuclearpeople of a given society, namely its poorest
weapons, it has also given hundreds of nuclearcitizens. Therefore, these sanctions seem to be
weapons to its close ally, Israel; the latter being asymbolic rather than an effective measure to
country which does not admit to owning nuclearcurb North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.
warheads and, therefore, also refuses to sign theSo, what is the solution? The obvious answer
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.would be to dismantle all nuclear weapons. This,
What is good enough for the US and its allies is, ithowever, is unlikely to happen and would leave
would seem, not good enough for states that aresecurity analysts delirious with regards to the
deemed as the ‘undesirables’. The UK,‘security vacuum’ that may arise if the
another Security Council member, is alsoworld’s strongest states lost their nuclear
condemning North Korea for its nuclear ambitionscapabilities. Nonetheless, the solution must lie with
despite the UK government’s renewal of itsa decrease in the overall numbers of nuclear
Trident nuclear missile system which could, byweapons which, unfortunately, is not occurring: the
some estimates, costs as much as £76bn.worlds’ nuclear powers have largely failed to
How, then, can such countries condemn thedeliver on promises to reduce their nuclear
actions of North Korea? Both India and Pakistanarsenals. This is hardly a strong platform in which
have developed their nuclear arsenals and, as ato ask other states to ditch their nuclear
result, both have experienced greater economicambitions.
and political engagement with the worlds’Greater cooperation between nuclear states and
superpower, the USA. This is the problem withthose hoping to join the Nuclear Club would also
nuclear weapons: to own them elevates a countrybe a more propitious path than an increase in
into an exclusive club whereby the benefitsbellicosity which leads to greater distrust and, as a
greatly outweigh the drawbacks of developingresult, stimulates an even greater desire for the
nuclear weapons. Moreover, the greaternon-nuclear state to develop a nuclear warhead.
polarisation of North Korea will no doubt furtherAnd while the main hypocrisy still exists, i.e. that
galvanise its desire to develop its own arsenal ofnuclear armed states continue to threaten
nuclear weapons given that its one-time nuclearnon-nuclear armed states regarding the
ally, China, is now condemning North Korea’slatter’s nuclear ambitions, the chances of
desire to develop its nuclear capability.dissuading a regime to renege on its commitment
One argument for this global condemnation is thatto develop a nuclear warhead appear very slim
countries which currently own nuclear weaponsindeed.
act ‘responsibly’ and that other