The Energy Pie, Use More or Conserve?

Over the past several years we have all becomegrow and process the crops. So we will take
painfully aware that CO2 emissions from fossilevery acre of plantable land on earth and plant
fuels likely play a significant role in worldwidethe most efficient crops we know of to generate
climate change. Our insatiable demand for energybiofuels. That should do it. Well, not really. That is
is driving prices up and generating more CO2 thanonly about 3 Terawatts. But we are on a roll, so
ever.let's continue.
How Much We UseSolar Cells
Today, the world uses about 12 Terawatts perPhotovoltaic technology has come a long way in
year for all uses. That is 12,000,000,000,000the last few decades. Efficiencies have improved
Watts. In a separate article I reviewed theseand costs have come down. And more plants are
sources of use which break down as:being built to supply more solar. A good size solar
Built Environment = 52% (40% for operationsplant today can manufacture enough solar cell's to
and 12% for materials)generate 1 gigawatt annually. Of course it would
Industry = 24%take 1000 plant-years to get to 1 Terawatt. And
Other Transport = 15%a lot of silicon (or other substrate). If we can
Passenger cars = 9%make 20,000 square miles worth of cells and
Energy from Many Sourcesplace them in sunny areas on earth, it will take all
There has been a lot of conversation aboutof the output of the current and planned plants
renewable energy sources such as solar, wind andfor the next 25-30 years. And how much power
others. One would think we are now generatingis that? About 2 Terawatts, if all goes right. Of
30% of our overall needs from these sources.course, only during the day, but that is another
Unfortunately, that is not the case. If we breakissue.
down the sources of energy worldwide we get:Add It All Up
Oil = 35%Adding up the largest sources at levels that we
Coal = 27%likely cannot attain, we still only end up with 6
Natural Gas = 20%Terawatts out of the 30 Terawatts total required
Hydro = 6%to meet our needs. Add in wind, solarthermal,
Biomass = 6%wave energy etc. and there is maybe another
Nuclear = 5%Terawatt. So basically, while these are all excellent
GeoThermal = under 1%businesses and fine technologies that must be
Wind, PV, SolarThermal = under 1%pursued, we cannot count on renewable energy
The largest energy sources are Oil, Coal andsources alone to get us to the promised land.
Natural Gas. All fossil fuels which generateConservation
significant CO2 emissions. And the cost of all ofThe only hope we have of addressing CO2 and
these fuels has doubled in from 2007 to 2008.climate change is conservation. Since renewables
Future Energy Demandcan only deliver some 6 to 9 Terawatts total, we
Our demand for energy is increasing worldwide, athave to deal with as much of the 21+ Terawatts
an ever increasing rate. Given the current rate ofin other ways. As discussed earlier, the built
increase, several estimates put worldwide demandenvironment is responsible for 52% of worldwide
at 30 Terawatts within 30 years, an increase ofCO2. In order to address the built environment,
18 terawatts, more than double today'swe need to address the materials (such as new
requirements. So we need move to renewablecement, drywall, metal processes) as well as
sources which don't generate CO2 when burned.building operations (primarily heating and cooling).
Solar, biofuels, nuclear. Sounds like a plan! Or isCompanies like CalStar and Serious Materials are
there trouble in paradise. Let's consider each one.re-inventing the old processes, reducing embodied
Nuclearenergy by 75% or more.
Nuclear power generation does not emit CO2, orWe all can address operations, at least at home.
much of anything else. The heat from a controlledEasiest targets are sealing ductwork, installing
nuclear reaction boils water into steam that spinsprogrammable thermostats, insulating homes that
a turbine. 3 new plants are planned and beginningaren't, and choosing high R value windows (at
the license process in the US. And possibly asleast R6 and preferable higher). Up to 50% of
many as 8 worldwide this year (requestingheat loss occurs through windows which are
licenses). Let's go out on a limb and hope thatclosed. Upgrading to dual pane low E windows is
somehow that figure grows to 45 new licensesonly gets to an R3. New technology is becoming
this year, and 45 more every year for the nextavailable (such as ThermaProof Windows) which
30. And they each take no more than 10 yearscan provide R values above R10. A 300%
to build. And what is the result of in 30 years? 1improvement and a significant savings in heating
Terawatt. Not the 30 total we need, or the 18and cooling bills.
additional Terawatts in growth. Just 1 lousyThe Result
Terawatt. Puts it all in perspective.If we begin addressing out built environment, we
BioFuelscan easily reduce the energy required by 75%
This technology is controversial since it takes realover today's inefficient buildings and materials. The
energy to grow and harvest crops. The fullresult would be a 12 terawatt savings in 30 years.
analysis of many of the biofuel processes weAnd it is the least expensive 12 terawatts
have suggests that some (such as corn ethanol)available, much less expensive than more coal
use more energy to make and distribute than wepower plants, which is the alternative.
get back out. But that argument aside, let'sSo what will you do? Save the environment and
pretend for the moment that we get 100%your energy bill too. Make the right choice and act
efficiency and there is no energy required tonow.