Speculators Could Drive Uranium to $55/Pound-or Higher

SUMMARY: TradeTech LLC Chief Executive Genewas much higher than the market at the time.
Clark talked with StockInterview about theBasically, you reached a point where the cheap
uranium bull market, where his price models showstuff has been sold. Now, we have to actually
uranium prices heading and when to expect thespend some money, some capital, to build new
peak of the current upward cycle of the bullfacilities, new mines and new mills. That was, I
market. When will "hard" times again hit thethink, the earliest signal of the price needing to
uranium market, and how long will the trough last?adjust.
And what does the future hold for the uraniumStockInterview: Isn't there a ton of hype across
price? An industry insider gives us his insights.all media channels about the "nuclear renaissance"
StockInterview: When the uranium bull marketand the demand for more nuclear energy?
began, did you foresee $40/pound uranium, nowGene Clark:
that the spot price has risen above this level?First of all, all the hype about nuclear renaissance
Gene Clark: I don't think any of us saw $40 peris really in the United States. The Chinese have
pound coming. We had price projections at thehad plans to expand for a long time. The
time that indicated probably $25 per pound, whichJapanese have been steadily adding new capacity.
would be a long term equilibrium price in constantKoreans have been adding new capacity. Indians
dollar terms. But, I think it was a surprise thehave been adding new capacity all along, all the
price went up so high. I think what's going, theway through this, even before we started this
biggest factor right now, is the advent of the sodiscussion on nuclear renaissance. I think that
called hedge funds or speculator funds and otherphrase is really focused more in the United
such groups. The price started to go up, and theyStates, which really hasn't ordered a plant since
came into the market with the express purpose1976 or something like that. There is a boom.
of buying for holding and then selling into theMaybe it's the uranium renaissance.
market later to realize the trading profit. In 2005,StockInterview: Is all of what we've been reading
the hedge funds were responsible for purchasingjust plain hype?
about 10 million pounds of the 29 million poundsGene Clark: There is some hype, but there is also
purchased. I think the market is now finallysome substance. A part of it is certainly a change
adjusting to the realities of primary supply andin public attitude about nuclear power. If I was
demand. It's been a depressed market for 20 orriding on an airplane, ten years ago, and someone
30 years, primarily from the draw down ofasked me what I did for a living, I was
excess inventories, and what we call secondaryguaranteed to have a lousy trip, arguing about
supply.nuclear power. When I mention it now, I get a
StockInterview: Will the speculators remain activepositive response. There's been a marked shift in
in driving the spot uranium price higher?public attitude about nuclear power. From the
Gene Clark: I think there is still some room forstandpoint of the utilities that would be ordering
further speculation activity. Uranium Participationnuclear plants. To the extent that they need new
Corporation, for example, is rumored to be aboutcapacity, looking at nuclear now is not off the
to come to the equities market again to raisedrawing boards, partly because of public attitude.
funds for another purchase. They're asking forThe industry has been moving through this trough
authority to buy UF6, as well as U308, andperiod, preparing itself for a new era. It remains
different forms of uranium than they were lockedto be seen when the first order comes. But when
into before. Whether it be at the 10 million poundthe first actual order of a nuclear power plant,
level (size of purchase), I think it kind of dependsalong with the license application does come, I
on where the market goes. If it tends to flattenthink you'll see several U.S. utilities following,
out, then I think there's going to be obviously lessprobably five utilities very actively involved.
interest on their part. When they were active inStockInterview: When will that actually happen?
the market, they, of course, wanted the price toGene Clark: I think it will come within the next five
go up. Therefore, they weren't too careful aboutyears, the ordering process. Of course it will be
what they paid for uranium. I think that's a partprobably another eight years before we actually
of it. In the long run, it was due for asee the first power plant from that process.
readjustment to reflect prices of the cost of newWe're talking probably about 13 years. That's how
production facilities. But, the hedge funds came inlong it takes. You can actually construct one in 48
and overdrove the market. Eventually, what it'smonths, but you have to have been through the
going to wind up doing is, if they sell off, it couldlicensing. If you don't believe the anti-nuclear
have the impact of driving prices back downpeople are going to be psyched up to fight the
below where they would otherwise have gone.first plant coming through, then you'd be very
StockInterview: Did the speculators interfere withnaïve. The first one is going to be more
the trading efficiency of the uranium market?difficult and take more time, I think.
Gene Clark: In theory, speculators come in, tendStockInterview: One anti-nuclear group told us
to take the risk and smooth out market prices.they do not believe we'll have more nuclear
But, it never really works out that way. Theypower plants in the United States.
always come in and only take the risk, if there'sGene Clark: That's possible, but given the current
an opportunity to make money. So some peoplecircumstances, my guess is we will have more
make a lot of money. It does tend to upset thenuclear plants. We need the capacity, whether
market. If you get away from the primary userswe're going to build coal plants (or other types of
of uranium and primary producers of uranium aspower generating plants). I just came from
your market participants, then you tend toCalifornia, moved here (to North Carolina) six
introduce more noise than you would like.months ago. They were talking in California about
StockInterview: With that in mind, in whichbuilding gas-fired plants for base load generation,
direction are your price projections going?which is the most ridiculous thing you can imagine.
Gene Clark: We're actually updating our uraniumThe plants are cheap to build, but the fuel cost is
price forecast right now. We haven't decided on aexorbitant. I did a speech a couple of years ago,
reference case yet. The reference cases we'rehaving looked at the Energy Information
looking at will peak at about $50 to $55 per poundAdministration's projections of gas demand. All the
in about three years, and will then drop off prettygrowth in natural gas demand is going to be in the
drastically. It has to do with a selling of theelectric utility sector. We are going to be importing
speculator reserves, the uranium that's being held60 percent of our gas supplies by 2020. Does
(for speculative purposes). I can see it comingthat make any sense? No. We have a lot of coal,
back down to $30, maybe below $30 per pound.but there are lots of complaints about coal
Then, in the long run - out through 2020 - gettingburning. In our state of North Carolina, the
easily back up over $40 per pound.attorney general is actually suing the Tennessee
StockInterview: Are you predicting a down cycleValley Authority (TVA) for the damage from coal
during the course of the uranium bull market?burning of the TVA's power plants in the adjacent
Gene Clark: Yes. It's pretty consistent withstate, in Tennessee. There's going to be continued
everything we're doing with the changes inpressure on coal burning. I think nuclear has as
requirements, in different cases of high, low, andgood a shot as any in terms of new capacity.
medium demand. Our modeling system isStockInterview: Some critics have argued China
projecting this. It has to do with the supply andand India will not be able to afford the massive
demand balance and the cost on the margin. Thenuclear power plant build up they've envisioned.
way to describe it is that prices have come to aGene Clark: If you think the Chinese are going to
point now of higher than we would havehave any problem financing things, you'd better
projected them to be, such that over-supply isthink twice. Let's focus on India. India is a clear
going to evolve. The large low cost projects willcase where, and it is a good rule of thumb, one
reach a point where supply then overshootspercent growth in gross domestic product
demand for a few years, which causes the pricerequires one percent growth in electricity
to come back down. Then demand growth, in therequirement. For India to grow economically, it
long run, picks up and puts a lot of pressure onneeds electric power. Where are they going to
the supply market to be able to meet theget it? They have coal plants there, as well. Once
demand. So you wind up with pressure towardyou use up all your hydro capacity, you really
the end of the period.don't have much to choose from, except coal,
StockInterview: But the markets are finicky, fillednatural gas, and nuclear. To the extent that they
with variables, and can frequently trick pricecan have economic growth and export income,
models.coming into their country, they would be able to
Gene Clark: Here's what it would take to shootfinance nuclear power plants. My guess is they're
that down: We have a problem with smallgoing to get the vendors of the nuclear plant to
numbers, and there are some very large projectshelp finance them.
- Cigar Lake, for example. The expansion ofStockInterview: Are you talking about the French?
Olympic Dam in Australia would be going fromGene Clark: Framatome - the company that
about 12 million pounds of production to over 30constructs the nuclear plants. Financing is generally
million pounds, if they finish. If you shift that outpart of the package. The first plants in China
by four or five years, or if the owner decides,were basically financed by the French
"No, we're not going to expand at all," you have agovernment. If the French go into India, you'll see
drastic effect. Then you would wind up with $100the same thing. The Russians have financed plants
per pound uranium, I think.for developing countries. That's not unusual for
StockInterview: What are your estimates on thethem to do. The United States may, or may not,
peak price years and the bottom years?get involved. I think there have been some types
Gene Clark: A lot of things could change, but hereof guarantees in the past, but not at the same
is what we're looking at. In one case scenario, thelevel as the Russians and French do it. I think
speculators are really going to stay out of thethose are the big choices. I wouldn't be surprised
market and holding onto their stuff for a longto see the South Koreans involved in the reactor
time. If so, then we're going to be at the peak byexport market. They've pretty much developed
the end of this year. If they stay active in thetheir own technology now. They have the
market and buying, then that stretches it outcapability of building 100 percent of a nuclear
further. Depending on the scenario, we see thepower plant in South Korea: the pressure vessels,
peak possibly at 2008 or so. I would say we'reall the steel requirements. They can do it all. We
looking at a trough around the timeframe of 2011really haven't seen them export yet, because
to 2013. Then back up after that.they've used up all their manufacturing capacity
StockInterview: How do you arrive at yourfor their own program. At some stage, I wouldn't
weekly numbers for the spot uranium price?be surprised to see that happen. And I think they
Gene Clark: We get our data from all of the keywould be able to finance reactor export sales.
sources: the utility fuel managers, sales staff andStockInterview: How are the U.S. utilities going to
management of uranium producers andfare in getting their "share" of uranium to fuel our
processors, and uranium traders, brokers anddomestic nuclear power plants in the context of
asset managers. Some are, of course, morethe apparent overwhelming Asian demand?
cooperative than others, and whom we callGene Clark: In reality, the U.S. utilities, which tend
depends on the type of information we areto wait longer to contract, may be the ones on
seeking. Since our price indicators are a judgmentthe losing end because the Chinese and the
call, we often focus on the losers in particularIndians will contract early. The implication of
recent transactions, as those will be the next tocurrent group-think is that the Chinese and Indians
make offers in the market.are not going to be able to find enough uranium
StockInterview: Let's back up a bit. Why hasfor their new plants. But, they are committing for
uranium gone up past the levels of the "cost ofsupplies way out into the future. When the U.S.
production," which would place the spot priceutilities come to the market, they're going to look
between $25 and $35/pound?around say, "Oh blankety- blank, what happened?
Gene Clark: The biggest factor, in signaling theWhere's the uranium?" They'll be the ones that
market, was when utilities went out for long termsat around. I think that is what's going to happen
bid requests. They found they reached a period inunless things really change in the way contracting
which producers would have to build new facilities.is done in the United States.
Producers building those facilities felt, "I have toCOPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc.
make at least enough profit to cover a return onALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
the construction costs for these facilities." That