Ron Paul, Pamela Geller, and Culturism at CPAC

At CPAC three positions on Islam were apparent.safeguard us.
One was represented by Pamela Geller'sGeller's event explained domestic Jihad initiatives.
"Freedom Defense Initiative" conference. TheWhereas Paul could not believe that an aggressive
second came from the Ron Paul followers. AndIslam for Islam's sake exists, Geller's speakers
the third appeared in the conference's otherwiseclearly showed that it can and does exist. As a
deafening silence on Islam. Culturism has a lot toculturist, I agreed with their domestic solution. We
say about all three positions.need culturist profiling at airports. We need to limit
Ron Paul's followers believe that Islamic terroristIslamic immigration. That is not, by the way, racist
attacks result from our overbearing presence in- it is culturist. And, we need to recognize that
the Middle East. Therefore, they recommendwestern cultural practices and laws are the norm
pulling our troops out of that region. As a culturist,and standard in western nations. We should not
I agree that we should not be nation building inrecognize Sharia courts or allow, for example,
Iraq and Afghanistan. As a culturist I believe theveils in photo Identification. Unlike multiculturalists,
project of turning these nations into progressiveculturists recognize that the West has a culture to
democracies with respect for individual rights willprotect and promote. Domestically Geller's group
fail because their cultures will not support suchwas very culturist.
changes. And I agree with Ron Paul's argumentCulturism and Geller diverge on foreign policy.
for disengagement based on our inability to affordCulturism believes in national cultural sovereignty.
these nation-building enterprises. Western culturistsAllen West said we should seek to defeat Islam,
know that if the West is not solvent our valuesnot Muslims. I am unclear how the two are to be
will die globally.separated. Quoting Ronald Reagan, he said victory
But none of Paul's followers could explain why themeans "we win, they lose." That statement holds
Jihad in Thailand and India exist. Neither nation hastoo little nuance for me. We all agree on bombing
military bases outside of their own borders. AsIran's nuclear sites and being aggressive in regions
multiculturalists do, the followers of Paul fail toof Afghanistan that harbor terrorist. But culturists
appreciate that diversity is real and important.do not believe we will convert Islamic nations by
Diversity is not just about food, festivals, andthe sword. If we want the sovereignty to pursue
fashion. Some cultures drop out of school earlyculturist policies domestically, we must also grant
and think teen pregnancy is not so bad. Otherthat right to other nations. We are not the world.
cultures think our way of life is a blasphemousWe are the West. The idea that we will convert
affront to God. Diversity is real and important.Islam nations by the sword is, as Ron Paul says, a
Overlooking the cultural aspects of Jihad will notdangerous proposition we cannot afford.