Poll shows that UK Civil Engineers are worried about Climate Change

More than 80% civil engineers are now not onlynon-renewable (fossil fuel) sources, and thereby
convinced that Climate Change is taking place:raising our national carbon dioxide emissions.
They also claim to be worried about it, accordingNuclear power is relatively carbon neutral, but all
to a poll of 519 Chartered UK Civil Engineers.new nuclear installations have been halted for the
The poll was carried out by the New Civilpast 15 years or so in the UK, due to:
Engineer, the official weekly magazine of the* public hostility to the acceptance of the risk of
profession, which is sent out to all members ofnuclear incidents, * the inability of the UK
the Institution of Civil Engineers. It was published ingovernment to solve the problem of nuclear
the 19 January 2006 edition.waste disposal,
What is more striking is that 56% said that they* and concerns about nuclear proliferation should
were prepared to change their lifestyles to helpthe UK be shown to be encouraging the use of
cut Britain’s energy consumption, and 51% ofnuclear at home when maintaining a policy that
those that expressed an opinion say that theythe developing nations should not themselves
would be prepared to alter their lifestyles to“Go nuclear”.
reduce the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions,Therefore, Dr Lovelock has proposed that
but would only do so - probably quitedangerous or not, the UK should build more
pragmatically and reasonably - if pushed to so donuclear power plants, and this has encouraged
by taxation or legislation to take these steps.government and professionals alike to reopen the
Also, in the response to these questions anuclear debate. This debate has now started, and
surprisingly large percentage actually said theyearly indications are that the civil engineers
would be prepared to change their lifestyle “ainvolved in much of the energy strategy work
lot”.and opinion-forming within government will be so
Subsequent editions have not raised anyconcerned about carbon dioxide emissions that all
comment from the members in the letter pageother concerns about nuclear power will be
or the editorial. So we can assume thatpushed aside. Such risks may be seen as
acceptance of anthropomorphic Climate Change in“risks to be managed” and risk taking of
the profession is mainstream and uncontested.this magnitude, as being a reasonable strategy,
The poll was actually carried out to gauge thewhen faced by the alternative threat of global
opinions of the profession on the nuclear debatecatastrophe.
currently underway; a debate which has beenHowever, whatever one’s view may be on
given additional momentum by Dr Lovelock’sthe nuclear power debate, the groundswell of
view that global warming effects are so severe,opinion is changing at least among this group of
and so inevitable now, that unless the rate ofprofessionals. Although one poll can never be
carbon emissions are reduced in less time than isconsidered conclusive it shows that these
available for normal political and economic action,professionals at least, comprise a constituency of
there will be no means by which the inevitableopinion which, if in time this was repeated across
drift toward catastrophe of Climate Change canthe community, would begin to sway the
be halted.government toward measures which might bring
Furthermore, Porfessor Lovelock (originator ofreal change in the future.
the Gaia Theory of natural systems) says that_________________
the UK has no choice but to go-nuclear again in aSteve Last is an environmental engineer who is
big way, especially since most of the 21% of ouralso a Chartered Environmentalist (CEnv), and lives
power which is at present generated by nuclearin the county of Shropshire, UK. CEnv is a new
power stations is soon to be lost when they areand growing academic discipline created in the last
closed, due to ageing.two years. All Chartered Environmentalists pledge
In fact, unless these stations are refurbished soonto further the principles of sustainability.
to extend their lives, only 7% of our power willPlease visit “Climate Change for Better or
be generated from nuclear by 2013, and we willWorse”, an independent web site about
have to build new nuclear plants just to avoid aClimate Change to find out more, and for the
significant demand for alternative forms ofreferences given.
generation, which can only be fully satisfied from