Part Five: The Lowdown on the Louisiana Energy Services Uranium Enrichment Facility

Who better than to explain the LES puzzle thanstudied the charges. "Here's my take as to why
Jim Ferland? As president of Louisiana Energythey took so long," he began. "Environmental
Services, Ferland came onboard nearly threejustice, at that time, was a relatively new
years ago. At the time, the LES project was stillconcept. There were not a lot of rules or
in Tennessee, but rapidly losing traction. Ferlandregulations in place about how you approve
admits the situation had gotten so bad inwhether or not environmental racism was going
Tennessee that his management team had toon. They spent a long time, arguing back and
look elsewhere.forth about how to make that decision. How do
First, we wanted to clarify exactly who ownsyou do those calculations?"
LES. Conflicting news reports, found in the newsSo what happened? "It is my understanding, at
items after LES was awarded the first NRCthe end of all that, LES was found to be in the
license for a nuclear facility in nearly thirty years,clear on that particular issue." What took so long
confused us. Ferland straightened us out on thisand why the unusual accusation? "I think it was,"
point, too. "LES is incorporated in Delaware. It's aFerland started, but paused for a moment.
limited partnership. I'll give you a quick rundown on"Anti-nuclear opponents will do whatever they can
the ownership. It is confusing." Six month ago,to slow down the licensing process. It was a
Westinghouse Electric owned 24.5 percent of LES.successful effort by the anti-nuclear folks to put
British Nuclear Fuels, which owns a one-third stakemassive delay into the licensing process to the
in Urenco, owned Westinghouse. On March 3rd ofpoint where the owner finally walked away."
this year, Urenco bought Westinghouse's minorityFinally, how did Louisiana Energy Services end up
interest in LES.in New Mexico? Abandoning the project in
Wait, it gets more confusing. "Back in the originalLouisiana, the company moved to Tennessee.
LES, which was back in Louisiana in the earlySome report the locals chased LES out of the
1990s, the utilities did have an equity share atstate. Ferland surprised us with his answer, "LES
that time," Ferland explained. "When the Urenconever submitted the license application to the
picked the project back up, to restart it in 2002,NRC."
the utilities tagged along. The utilities, though, didBut what's the real story, here? "I'll be very blunt
not have an equity ownership share." According toabout it," Ferland warned us. "Management
Ferland, Urenco bought out the three U.S. utilities -credibility was lost with the local population in
Entergy, Exelon and Duke - in exchange for someTennessee. A company like ours doing a project
cash and more cash payments going forward. "Alllike this, even though it's extremely safe and
that is happening now is the utilities earn the restextremely environmentally friendly, it's a nuclear
of their money back as LES meets certainproject." And this is advice to anyone hoping to
milestones going forward," said Ferland. "One ofcash in on the nuclear renaissance, "And if you
those milestones was (achieved) the day LESdon't have the credibility and trust of the public, in
received the NRC license. As of 2002, these threeall honesty, you can not proceed with the
utilities had no management say and no equityproject." Ferland cleared the air, "Management had
participation. They simply had some rights tosome issues in the way they addressed the public
some future cash flows, depending upon whetherand the press in Tennessee that caused them to
or not LES was successful. Essentially, we'relose credibility, and probably rightly so." The
paying the utilities back for the investment theysituation had gone so bad, Ferland admitted, "We
made in the early 1990s."could not turn that around."
The upshot is simple. Louisiana Energy Services isBased upon our interviews with state senators
a wholly owned subsidiary of Urenco Ltd. But thenand representatives, New Mexico's reaction was
again, get ready for a tad more confusion on themagical compared to what LES endured for the
ownership issue.past 16 years. "Marshall Cohen and his team did a
Urenco's British partner wants to sell its one-thirdvery good job in New Mexico," Ferland explained.
stake in the company. We asked Ferland if"We have, if it is done correctly, a relatively good
perhaps British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) was unhappyproject to sell. We can take folks to see the
with the New Mexico enrichment facility. "I don'toperating enrichment facility in Europe, which we
think so," he answered. "This is my personalare essentially copying." LES did that just that. We
opinion because I'm certainly not a member ofinterviewed New Mexico State Senators Leavell
management of BNFL. BNFL is looking to get outand Kernan, who both gave Urenco's Almelo
of the nuclear business completely. Recognize thatfacility their blessing. "It's ultra clean, ultra high tech
BNFL is a government-owned entity. I think theand has an extremely good environmental record
government has decided they don't need to be infor as long as it's been in existence, which is
the nuclear business. They've done many things.25-plus years." Ferland said with steel in his voice,
They are in the process of closing the transaction"If you do it right, it's a pretty easy project to
of selling Westinghouse. Their nuclearsell, and if you do it wrong, you can drive it into
decommissioning group is up for sale. The lastthe ditch very quickly."
major piece of the BNFL nuclear business is theCONCLUSION
one-third ownership they have in Urenco. Naturally,The LES project has gone past the "selling phase."
given that they're selling the other two, they haveGround breaking is in late August. Ferland told us
some interest in divesting that ownership piece asconstruction began this past week. LES will
well."provide Lea County, New Mexico and Andrews
Who will finally own BNFL, and thus becomeCounty, Texas with more that 800 construction
one-third owner of Urenco, and indirectly anjobs to build the National Enrichment Facility (NEF).
owner of the New Mexico enrichment facility?"We expect the first cascade to go online in late
Last week, London's Daily Telegraph reported the2008," said Ferland. Because this is a modular
French nuclear power firm, EDF, had offered todesign, more cascades will go online through 2013,
buy the BNFL stake for about two billion poundswhen the plant reaches its full capacity.
sterling. An EDF spokesman denied an offer had"We hope to deliver our first product in early
been made. According to Reuters, both the2009," he added. This will be a relatively small
German and Dutch stakeholders would opposeamount. "Ballpark, we'll roughly come up with 20
EDF's participation.percent of our output per year," Ferland explained.
This latest wrinkle is just one in another ofThis comes to about 600,000 SWU (Separative
several disruptive episodes as LES movesWork Units).
forward into operations. We talked with FerlandIt takes about 10 pounds of U3O8, which utilities
about charges of environmental racism inprovide to the enrichment facility, to create one
Louisiana, where LES first began its long journeySWU. "It's a three million SWU facility," Ferland told
to obtain an NRC license. As with every questionus. Three million SWU is about 25 percent of the
and concern we voiced, Ferland did not dither orU.S. requirement, he added.
back down, but instead methodically responded,From all indications, Ferland is running a tight ship.
"Urenco and its partners did begin the licensingUrenco appears to be solidly behind this tenacious,
process for LES around 1990. Come 1997, theybut level-headed corporate executive. He knows
still did not have the NRC license. Seven yearshow to run this business, he's built his team, and
pursuing a license is a long time. There were athey've created a miracle in New Mexico - the
variety of issues. One of them was environmentalfirst step in New Mexico's nuclear renaissance.
justice."COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc.
Ferland hadn't yet arrived at the time, but he hadALL RIGHTS RESERVED.