Obama, Energy Policy, and Dismal Energy Science

Economics is often called the dismal scienceIt cannot halt global overheating. The Obama
because of an article written by Thomas Carlyleadministration will hopefully have at least one
more than 150 years ago. In it he proposedqualified, influential scientist, who can debunk the
mockingly to reintroduce slavery to control laborprevailing beliefs in conservation and carbon
markets. During modern times, this monikertaxation. Global overheating can only be stopped
proves to be a prophetic choice. Modernby ending all fossil fuel combustion permanently!
economics have, after all, brought us not onlyWhat are the available options? Fossil fuel
free markets and unimaginable monetary rewardsreserves with the exception of petroleum are still
for the few chosen ones, but have also producedplentiful. However, petroleum is getting scarce,
the great depression of 1931, the world financialconsumption of petroleum is accelerating, and
crisis of 2008, and 12 recessions in the interveningpetroleum reserves will run out during the next
75 years.fifty to seventy years. As long as we burn
Just imagine a similar performance record forpetroleum products we add to accumulated
airplanes, skyscrapers, nuclear power plants, andcarbon dioxide in our atmosphere. Burning all our
bridges!remaining petroleum reserves will double or triple
The financial damages inflicted by systemicpast global warming.
deficiencies in our economic infrastructure areFortunately, we have access to two energy
unbearable and must not be tolerated any longer.sources that can provide plentiful, affordable,
These deficiencies are manmade and are causedemission-free energy for centuries. These energy
by regularly failing institutions. Yet, we not onlyresources are sun radiation and nuclear fuels. Sun
continue to support these institutions, but bailenergy does not produce any pollutants or
them out without conditional provisions thatwastes. Sun energy is inexhaustible. Nuclear fuels
prevent them from paying irrational bonuses towill last at least for another century, are still
their management and using the bailout fundinginexpensive, but produce radioactive waste. This
for starting the engineering of the next recession,waste must and can be managed. There is one
depression, or financial crisis. Crises are theunmatched advantage to these two energies;
occasions when the chosen cash in.they will stabilize atmospheric carbon dioxide
Obama has committed himself to bring change toemissions and will end global warming.
our country. He has promised to address theThere is one major drawback to these energy
lingering energy crisis during his presidency. It nowsources, too. Both energies must be converted
appears that he too is following the battle cry ofinto energy forms that world economies are
the unholy alliance between industry andaccustomed to use. Nuclear fuel can be converted
environmental groups and is demanding theinto electricity. Sun energy can be converted into
conservation of energy to save the planet. Thiselectricity and into irreplaceable liquid fuels.
demand is not based on scientific facts but onWhy are we not installing facilities for converting
belief in dismal science. It also will waste billions ofthese savior energies and stop burning fossil
dollars spent for doomed-to-fail conservationfuels?
efforts.The reasons are economical, political, financial, and
Energy conservation and Cap and Trade conceptscultural. A few explanations may be helpful.
cannot save our planet from overheating, cannotInstalling a nuclear power plant is expensive and
slow sea level rise, cannot prevent climatemay last ten years. Additionally, political and
changes, and cannot save animal and plant speciescultural forces in society are trying to prevent the
from extinction. However, they will significantlyproliferation of nuclear technologies.
increase profits of energy companies and willConversion of sun energy into electricity is
assure that energy costs will continue their onlytechnically not as far advanced as nuclear energy
occasionally interrupted rise into the sky.conversion. Well managed efforts for closing
In 1997, a comparably small number oftechnology gaps can produce needed results in
industrialized countries in Europe and across theless than a decade. Developmental technologies
world signed the Kyoto Protocol. The signatorieslike wind power conversion and direct conversion
to this agreement committed themselves toof sun energy into electricity can be installed
reduce their greenhouse gas discharges andimmediately. Electricity produced with commercially
especially their carbon dioxide emissions in futureavailable conversion equipment will at first be
years. Virtually all of these emissions are producedconsiderably more expensive than presently
by fossil fuel combustion.generated electricity. A reasonably large number
In the years following, the USA, China, India, andof facilities must be subsidized initially to further
many other countries refused to sign because ofadvance technologies and reduce equipment costs.
the glaring deficiencies of the Kyoto provisions.Continuing installation activities will also encourage
These dissenting countries proved to be right.development and demonstration of energy
The signors of the Kyoto agreements werestorage.
absolutely correct on one count; the continuationConverting sun energy into liquid fuels is still in its
of fossil fuel based carbon dioxide emissions willinfancy. Only proper management and funding can
destroy our Earth. Unfortunately, theirdevelop needed technologies in ten to fifteen
understanding of energy science was flawed.years. Initial evaluations indicate that liquid fuels
They made the same mistake our economistsconverted from sun energy can be produced for
continue to make. Continuing with deficit spendingabout fifty dollars per barrel.
and increasing leverage of financial institutionsWhy has this technology not been developed
forever cannot save national economies andearlier? This question is difficult to answer. The
prevent financial crises. Similarly, continuing thequestion falls into the same dismal category as
discharge of fossil fuel emissions forever cannotinquiries into the causes for the periodic
stop global warming and related damages.recurrence of depressions and financial crises.
We must face reality. Conservation can at bestAnswers are by definition irrational.
slow atmospheric accumulation of carbon dioxide.