Iran's Nuclear Weapons From a Historical and Regional Perspective

Introductionas build a viable and deliverable nuclear weapons
Since the early seventies Iran has been seen ascapability".
an important regional player in the Middle East andSo, the revolution, the war with Iraq and more
Gulf region. However, after the fall of Saddamrecent conflicts in the Middle East changed Iran's
Hussein in 2003, Iran was largely ignored. Israel'svision of the world with regard to foreign and
conflicts with its neighbours were seen as thesecurity policy. Major allies turned into major
main sources of regional instability and theenemies after 1979; the U.S. and Israel became
Palestinian issue was seen as the root cause ofIran's biggest foes in the Middle East. Iran fears
the region's problems. Because of this many,U.S. presence in the region as it may destabilize
mostly European, policymakers focused stronglythe country's position. Furthermore, Iran sees
on settling the Palestinian question while ignoringitself as a competitor with Israel's hegemonic
the situation in Iran. Iran has been in the news forposition in the Middle-East. Since 1979 Iran's
the last year because of its nuclear program,foreign policy has been dictated by the need to
which is of importance to the whole internationalmaintain sovereignty and independence, this can
community. In this essay we will consider thebe seen in the light of past interventions and
geopolitical background of Iran in the region, afterinterferences by regional and global powers. A
that we will take a look at the geopoliticalreligious dimension is also of importance in its
importance and strategic implications of developingpolicies, as well as maintaining good relations with
nuclear weapons by Iran.countries not seen as a threat to the country.
Iran's foreign policy history within the Middle EastNuclear weapons within the regional context
To understand the country's current geopoliticalAs considered above, the security situation is of a
position within the region and its apparent wish togreat importance to the country, considering
develop nuclear weapons, it is necessary tohistoric events. These events have created a
understand the country's geopolitical history withinsense of isolation. Iran has learned that they do
the region of the Middle-East. Special attention willnot want to depend on anyone, to be prepared
be paid on the period around and after thefor anything at all times and to deter the outside
revolution of 1979.world. A military modernization program, including
Centuries ago the famous French political theoristdeveloping nuclear weapons technology, has been
Jean Bodin said that foreign policies of countriesset in motion since the events of the 1970s and
are determined by their geographical location. This1980s. The importance of Iran's nuclear weapons
is certainly applicable in the case of Iran.program has been highlighted in recent years. To
Twenty-five centuries of Persian history tells us awhat degree is this program of importance to
story of an Empire with huge ambitions; includingIran's regional power?
conquests of Babylon, Egypt and Persian rule upIt has consistently denied the existence of a
to the Nile Valley. However, the geographicnuclear weapons program since the time of the
position has also made the country vulnerable toShah, at the same time it has consistently
great power interference. This fear for foreignacknowledged a nuclear research program and in
intervention has strongly formed Iran's foreigninsisting it needs for nuclear power for peaceful
policy until today. Iranian history, geographicpurposes. So, Iran has always been able to point
position, size and demographic status suggests toto nuclear power as an excuse for its activities.
Iranian leaders that the country rightly deserves aThe question is whether it needs nuclear power
dominant position in the region. Nowadays Iran isenergy, as it has the second-largest reserves of
surrounded by countries as Armenia, Azerbaijan,oil and gas in the world. So it is necessary to
Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkey andconsider the underlying motives for developing
Iraq. One of Iran's major concerns is its securitynuclear weapons. Ayatollah Khameini, Iran's
policy, as the country is surrounded by friendlysupreme leader, justifies his country's nuclear
and unfriendly nations.programme on the basis of scientific
In the early 1950s the elected nationalistadvancement, self-sufficiency and political
government of Mohammed Mossadeq wasindependence. The perception of the West, Israel
overthrown by a coup engineered by the U.S. Heand some Arab Gulf countries, is that Iran is not
was replaced by the Shah Mohammed Rezadeveloping the programme for civilian purposes
Pahlavi, who ruled Iran from 1941 until 1979. Underbut is trying to develop nuclear weapons. Since
the Shah the country became a major player inthe arrival of President Ahmadinejad, the country
the Persian Gulf with U.S. support. Iran benefitedhas hardened its nuclear policy. It has stated on
from extensive U.S. financial and military aid, somany occasions that it is not developing nuclear
that it could police the Gulf region and containweapons, while at the same time stating that the
Soviet Union's influence. It also played an activecountry has the right to have nuclear technology.
role in the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO).Iran always speaks about "peaceful purposes" of
CENTO's goal was to contain the Soviet Unionits program and that it's opposed to nuclear
during the Cold War. After the withdrawal ofproliferation. There are different reports on the
British troops in the 1970s, Iran de facto becameactual status of its nuclear program; the IAEA
the guardian of the Gulf. The Shah alsorevealed in 2003 that its inspectors found parts of
consolidated his country's military and securityhighly enriched Uranium in Natanz, however the
relationship with Israel. The Shah was keen onU.S. Nation Intelligence Estimate suggested that it
downplaying the role of Islam (and thus thehalted its program in 2003. Defense Secretary
clergy) in his policies, he was a modernizerGates still believes that Iran wants to continue to
focused on a nationalistic campaign to establishdevelop nuclear weapons and it seems clear that
Iran as a regional power in the Middle East. TheIran continues to enrich uranium, which is
regime of the Shah forged political consensusnecessary for civilian and military nuclear
within the country by playing the nationalism card,programs. Certainly the development of ballistic
providing economic development, modernizing themissile technology and other long-range systems
military and establishing real growth through theis of importance, as they could threaten Europe
export of oil. The clergy blamed all the problemsand the United States in the future.
on the Shah's dependency on the United States.Whatever the status of Iran's nuclear program is
In 1979 the Shah was ousted and Imam Ayatollahat the moment, Dr Irani, Professor on the Middle
Rhollah Khomeini returned from exile. The reasonsEast, believes that by developing and enhancing
for the revolution of 1979 can be found in Iran'snuclear capabilities Iran will become a major player
state of the economy in that period; stagflationat the regional level, as well as being able to
and unemployment were extremely high. Thereassert its deterrent capabilities against potential
was also a strong opposition against the Shahenemies in the region, such as Israel. Cordesman
who had a wealthy lifestyle, this was seen inand Al-Rodhan agree with this assessment in their
connection with his relation to the U.S. Most of thebook "Iran's weapons of mass destruction", the
money was spend on military equipment insteadability to use long-range missiles and the
of domestic infrastructure. In addition, the Shahpossession of nuclear weapons will be of much
created an atmosphere where repression wasimportance to its strategic posture in the region.
associated with the U.S. and deceit and treacheryShahram Chubin underlines this assumption, he
survived at all levels of government and society.sees a nuclear capability as a symbolization of the
This has formed the country's way of thinkingcountry's quest for regional leadership. Nuclear
until today, as Graham Fuller puts it: "Mistrustcapabilities provide Iran with a means to block the
became the first line of defense". ModernizationU.S. inspired regional order, which is seen as a
did not bring to many Iranians what theythreat to the country and the management of
expected and many of them turned to religion forregional security issues in the region. Iran is more
an answer, this made it possible for Khomenei tointerested in good relations with countries like
step into the power vacuum and seize power.Russia and China, in order to reduce U.S. influence
After the revolution it took on a different foreignin the region and enhance its own influence.
policy. The hostage in the U.S. Embassy in TehranAyatollah Khameini, criticizes the U.S. and Israel for
changed its relations with the U.S., they were notheir opposition to the country's nuclear program:
longer seen as allies. On the contrary, hostility"They are opposed to the progress and
would best characterize their relationshipdevelopment of the Iranian nation. They do not
afterwards. The U.S. stopped cooperation withwant an Islamic and independent country to
Iran in the military and nuclear field, and putachieve scientific progress and possess advanced
pressure on other countries to do the same. Thistechnology in the Middle East region, a region
change in attitude of the U.S. showed itswhich possesses most of the world's oil... They
perspective on what was good for the Shah, waswant Iran's energy to be always dependent on oil,
not good for the Imam. The fundamental guidingsince oil is vulnerable to the policies of world
principle of the Iranian revolution with regard to itspowers. They aim to control other nations with
foreign policy was Khomeini's slogan 'Na Sharq, Nainvisible ropes". Most analysts seem to agree that
Gharb, Faqat Jumhuri-ye Islami' - 'neither East, northe country's nuclear program is a way to
West, only the Islamic Republic'. Since the Iranianenhance its regional influence in maintaining peace
revolution its foreign policy is guided by supportand stability without foreign interference. For
for oppressed peoples of the world and theirexample it would see itself as a broker for
struggle for justice, solidarity with and support forregional problems such as the Israeli-Palestinian
Islamic groups and opposition to the U.S. Theconflict.
country's revolutionary leadership wanted toThe balance of power would certainly be altered if
speak in the name of Islam and promote Shi'ism,Iran becomes a nuclear power, as it would pose a
this caused tensions in its relations with Saudichallenge to Israel's nuclear supremacy. It could
Arabia and other important Islamic (mostly Sunnialso lead to an arms race in the Middle East and
dominated) states and actors in the Muslim world.Iran would pose a threat to U.S. troops in the
After 1979 a new order had to be established inregion. These nuclear ambitions appear menacing
the country. Almost immediately after thein the region, relations with Saudi Arabia are
revolution Iran was also involved in a war againststrained over Iraq, and Turkey sees Iran's bid for
Iraqi forces under Saddam Hussein, who launchedstronger regional influence as dangerous. The
a large scale offensive in September 1980. Early insmaller Gulf states are more occupied with
the war Iran impressively won battles and repelledterrorism and not reassured by Iran's policies. The
Iraq. Iran then pushed on to Iraq and tried toSaudi leadership has been clear about the
topple Saddam Hussein, however it quickly foundconsequences of a nuclear Iran. Prince Saud
itself unable to fight against the modern militaryal-Faisal has said a nuclear Iran "threatens disaster
hardware of the Iraqi's, which was provided forin the region". However Saudi officials have said
by the West. Two Iraqi weapons were especiallythe problem lies in the double standard of the
troublesome; tactical ballistic missiles (SCUDS) andWest towards Israeli nuclear capabilities. There
chemical weapons. Iran was outraged by thehave been official statements by senior Saudi
silence of the Western world when Iraq usedofficials, who said that a possible response to
chemical weapons, which was a clear violation ofIran's nuclear weapons might be developing
international law. After eight years of war, Irannuclear weapons themselves. The same may
had learned many lessons. The main lessons forapply to a country like Egypt. The Arab League
the country were that they could not rely on thesupports the position of a nuclear free Middle East.
international community where its defense andThe League has said Iran's nuclear ambitions are
security was concerned, that some states wouldtied to Israel's nuclear capabilities, because it
not be bound by rules when it came down to warserves as an incentive for countries to develop
and that Iran should be prepared for anything. Itweapons with a similar capacity. The Egyptian
understood it would not receive any assistanceMuslim Brotherhood has said that if Iran would
from the West against Iraq unless it was in thebecome a nuclear power it would be considered a
West's interest. The Iranians also saw that thedisaster, as the country would gain more influence
West was unwilling to intervene and stop Iraq'sto establish a Shi'ite crescent. As the United
use of chemical weapons. Because the war wasStates has failed to address Israeli nuclear
taken into the cities of Iran, the Iranians learnedcapabilities in formulating policy towards Iran's
that having a credible deterrent force of its ownnuclear program, Iran's neighbours seem to be
is extremely important. As Iran had none it wasunderstanding of their wish to develop nuclear
extremely vulnerable. By the end of the 1980snuclear weapons, even though the danger of it
Iran was regionally at odds with Iraq, Kuwait,seems clear to them. Iran's neighbours have three
Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Egypt, Israel, Jordan,options to respond to a nuclear Iran: acquire their
Morocco, Tunisia, North Yemen and Afghanistan. Itown WMD and missile capabilities to deter Iran,
only had friendly relations with Syria, Southdevelop a missile defense shield and/or ask the
Yemen and Libya, and maintained normal relationsU.S. or Pakistan to extend their nuclear deterrence
with Algeria, Pakistan and Turkey. However theto include them. Former Foreign Affairs Minister of
end of the war (whereby Iran unconditionallyGermany Joschka Fischer explained the situation in
accepted Security Council Resolution 598) openedthe Middle East perfectly: "The most important
the door to normalization of relations with manyshift in the Middle East has been a shift in the
Arab Gulf neighbours, except Saudi Arabia andregion's political and military center of gravity...
Iraq. The end of the war with Iraq (which was anWhile Israel, Palestine and Lebanon defined the
Arab ally of the Soviet Union) also made itmost important hot spots in the old Middle East,
possible for Iran and Russia to improve theirregional power and politics in the wake of the Iraq
relations on the military, political and economicwar is now centered in the Persian Gulf. The
front, which continued improving even more afterdominant conflict is no longer the Israeli-Palestinian
the collapse of the Soviet Union. The relationsstruggle, but the threat of confrontation between
with Pakistan and Turkey improved, especially asIran and Saudi Arabia for sub-regional supremacy
both these countries, together with Iran, wereand between Iran and the U.S. for regional
the founders of the Economic Cooperationhegemony".
Organization. This was particularly important toConclusion
Iran as it was surrounded by Arab alliances (ArabNo one can ignore Iran anymore in the politics of
Cooperation Council and Gulf Cooperation Council).the Middle East, as the country has become an
During the Persian Gulf war of 1990 Iran took onimportant regional player over the last thirty
a neutralist stance, this helped the country toyears. The national and regional history of the
improve relations with its Arab neighbors, such ascountry, which is filled with conflicts and foreign
Jordan, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Morocco.interference, has influenced the country's security
The improvement of relations with some ofand foreign policy thinking up to today.
these countries continued into the 1990s.Independence and sovereignty have become the
However the Gulf crisis also provided a catalystkey words in its foreign policy. In that regard a
for more (military) influence of Western powers instronger influence in the region is important to the
the region, which Iran saw as troublesome. In thecountry, and certainly the development of nuclear
post-Cold War era Iran has tried to work againstweapons supports that line of thinking. In other
U.S. interests and attract non-U.S. western capital,words, pragmatism prevails over ideology. The
on the other hand it tried to deepen regionalposition and policies of Iran in the region will be of
cooperation with ECO, GCC, South Asian groupsmuch importance to the international community
and improve its alliances with Syria, China, Northin the years to come. Certainly the President of
Korea, Russia, India, Greece and Georgia. Lastly,the United States, Barack Obama, will need to
recent conflicts in the Middle East region havefocus on Iran if stability and security are to be
been of importance to Iran, in particular theachieved within the Persian Gulf and the greater
Afghanistan war of 2001 and the Iraq war ofMiddle East. The recent approach of President
2003, which have showed U.S. conventionalObama towards the country can be seen as a
superiority. But also the Lebanon war of 2006, infirst step in the right direction of developing
which Iran supported Hezbollah against Israel, canmutual understanding and enhancing diplomatic
not be forgotten. These events in the regionrelations. Time will tell whether Iran is willing to
have forced the country to improve its militaryfollow up on this approach, whether the U.S. is
forces, however the economic costs of creatingseriously interested in closer relations with Iran
a military force comparable to Saudi Arabia orand whether other key global and regional players
Israel is huge. In this regard nuclear weapons aresuch as Israel, Russia, the EU and Arab countries
important to consider; a nuclear weapon capabilitywill be able to contribute to a constructive
would not necessarily mean that a moderndevelopment of stability in the region. It is hopeful
conventional force is not necessary, but as Perrythat cooler heads will prevail and in the long term
puts it: "to drive events in the Middle East, Iran willfruitful solutions will be found to address deep
have to continue to modernize its forces as wellfeelings of hate and hostility within the region.