India and Pakistan Relationship

India and Pakistan, as two nations united byHence, new strategies and tactical concepts have
history but divided by destiny, are almost like twoto be adopted and the conflict has to be fought
estranged siblings. Their rivalries over five decadeson a pattern other than war.
have prevented both the countries from realizingThis is because of the fact that Kashmir dispute
their full economic and geopolitical potential.is potentially one of the most dangerous disputes
Since the founding of India and Pakistan asin the world. With both India and Pakistan declaring
separate states in 1947, the dispute over whothemselves to be nuclear powers with a string of
should control Kashmir has been one of thenuclear tests, signs are not good.
world's most enduring and violent conflicts. ThereIt is worth recalling that the world has already
are also signs of a religious conflict at play, pittingsaw a huge deployment of troops on both sides
predominantly Hindu India against Muslim Pakistan.of the border in 2002 as India reacted to an
There has been a paradigm shift since the initialarmed attack on the National Parliament in Delhi,
stages of insurgency in Kashmir. The direct, bold,the previous December.
loudly eulogized direct strategy of the insurgentsIndia said the attack was carried out by
establishing themselves as protectors of thePakistani-based militants assisted by the Pakistan
people of Kashmir and suitable spreading theirGovernment - a charge always denied by
cause through the media, has since seen manyPakistan. In the worst-case scenario, the Kashmir
changes in the methodology.dispute would trigger a nuclear conflict. Aside from
It is worth recalling that the territory of Kashmirthat, the separatist militancy and cross-border
was hotly contested even before India andfiring between the Indian and Pakistani armies has
Pakistan won their independence from Britain inleft a death toll running into tens of thousands and
August 1947. Under the partition plan provided bya population brutalized by fighting and fear.
the Indian Independence Act of 1947, KashmirAccording to experts, religion is an important
was free to accede to India or Pakistan.aspect of the dispute. Partition in 1947 gave
The Maharaja, Hari Singh, wanted to stayIndia's Muslims a state of their own: Pakistan. So a
independent but eventually decided to accede tocommon faith underpins Pakistan's claims to
India, signing over key powers to the IndianKashmir, where many areas are
Government - in return for military aid and aMuslim-dominated.
promised referendum.In theory, the population of the
Since then, the territory has been the flashpointIndian-administered state of Jammu and Kashmir
for two of the three India-Pakistan wars: the firstis over 60 per cent Muslim, making it the only
in 1947-48, the second in 1965. In 1999, Indiastate within India where Muslims are in the
fought a brief but bitter conflict withmajority.
Pakistani-backed forces that had infiltratedThe LoC divides Kashmir on an almost two-to-one
Indian-controlled territory in the Kargil area.basis: the region in the east and south, with a
Theoretically speaking, there was a suddenpopulation of about 9 million, falls into the
mushrooming of a number of jihadi groups inIndian-controlled state of Jammu and Kashmir,
mid-1990s in J&K. With the purse stringswhile the Pakistani-administered Kashmir to the
tightly controlled by the Pakistani leadership, thenorth and west, with a population about three
supposedly indigenous struggle of freedom for allmillion, is labelled by Pakistan as "Azad" (Free)
in Kashmir became a Pakistan-sponsored fight ofKashmir. China also controls a small portion of
terror. This was backed by Pakistan's militaryKashmir.
might, especially with regard to artillery support,The US has an "interest" in seeing if a "final
intelligence sharing and provision of training in thesettlement" of the Kashmir issue can be reached,
well-established training camps at select placesand is trying to help build on the progress made
with instruction being imparted on latest explosiveby India and Pakistan on the "composite dialogue".
techniques."The US is not a mediator. But we respect the
In recent years, the tactics of the terrorists hasconsiderable progress that's been made by
changed and it has some sort of relation withPakistan and India in the composite dialogue and
their level of indoctrination and the employment ofwe're just trying to help build whatever we can
fidayeen squads hitting the well-protected andon that progress," pointed out the US Under
fortified Army establishments. On the other hand,Secretary of State, Nicholas Burns, recently.
the Security forces have also been changing theirThe friction between India and Pakistan is relevant
strategies from seek-and-destroy missions toto the rest of the world not only because both
cordon and search missions to boxed-in specificare the newest members of the nuclear club; it
missions.also affects the stability and economic potential of
The technology for both, the terrorists and theregion that includes more than a billion people,
security forces have also been constantlysome 950 million in India alone.
changing with a one-up mode. If the terroristsThere is, of course, a pervasive cynicism in South
used a particular band-width spectrum forAsia concerning Indo-Pakistan relations, which sees
communications or a frequency band-width spreadall peace negotiations as doomed enterprises. But
for remote controlled IEDs, then the securityone needs to examine the context of present
forces developed a counter. A counter forced thenegotiations carefully to assess the chance for
terrorists to change the pattern resulting in yetbetter outcomes. What factors produced the
another counter by the security forces and thecurrent rapprochement? Have changes in the
game goes on. Even the weaponry andinternational environment (especially the 9/11
communication equipment have been constantlyattacks) played a transformative role? The
modified and updated.mainstream media around the world recently
But the question to be asked at this point of timehave praised Indian and Pakistani leaders for
is why there is a situation of deadlock in theengaging in dialogue and welcomed interventions
Kashmir issue between the two countries? It'sof US diplomacy to avert escalation of a
because of the fact that no side is willing to givepotentially nuclear conflict.
an inch to another. Islamabad says Kashmir shouldRegarding Kashmir, India has moved away from
have become part of Pakistan in 1947, becauseits hard stance that it would not negotiate until
Muslims are in the majority in the region. Pakistanborder incursions stopped. It has also withdrawn
also argues that Kashmiris should be allowed tosome of its troops. Pakistan, on its part, has
vote in a referendum on their future, followingrelaxed its demand that a plebiscite be conducted
numerous UN resolutions on the issue.to resolve the dispute. Neither country any longer
On the other hand, India does not wantclaims the whole of Jammu and Kashmir. Citizens
international debate on the issue, arguing that thein each country are beginning to see that a
Simla Agreement of 1972 provided for acompromise is needed.
resolution through bilateral talks. India points to theWhat factors have influenced Pakistan? One is
Instrument of Accession signed in October 1947recognition of the growing disenchantment of
by Maharaja Hari Singh. Moreover, both India andPakistani middle class citizens over Kashmir policy.
Pakistan reject the option of Kashmir becomingThe media and intelligentsia have raised questions
an independent state.about the high cost of Pakistan's support of
From large counter-reactionary force, the ArmyKashmir's secessionist struggle. This policy resulted
had to adept to small mission-oriented groups withnot only in diplomatic isolation but a decline in trade
the need of quick real time information beingand tourism and a serious lag in technology
made available only through proper local contactsdevelopment. Such a policy also fostered
and the quick reaction teams proving to beconfrontation with India, and the development of
extremely effective in the conflict. Use ofnuclear weapons as a consequence of
helicopters and satellite imagery was also"militarization". Further, the support of Islamic militia
extremely effective, keeping the terrorists on thedamaged Pakistan's image abroad while,
move at regular intervals. The construction ofdomestically, these religious groups began a
fence right along the Line of Control (LoC) alsogradual "Talibanization" of civil society, causing
had an effect on lowering the scales of infiltrationdiscord and sectarian divisions.
although, in the long run, it may prove to beTheoretically, the Pakistani establishment realizes
rather costly and counter-productive. Mine-layingthat its 14 year-old policy of trying to bleed India
and other obstacles being created, on the lines ofthrough Kashmir has failed. India has not only
a conventional war-counter systems do lendabsorbed the damage, but has won a good deal
toward complacency and in my view are not theof sympathy from the international community,
best means of inflicting casualties on the terrorists.especially the US.