Has the UN Become Irrelevant?

August 7, 2006decreasing stability in the Middle East while Iran
In a September 2002 speech to the UN Generaltries to better its geopolitical position. The Iranian
Assembly, President Bush asked a pointed andgovernment deals harshly with dissent at home
crucially important question to the nationaland uses international terror to increase its power
representatives who had gathered to hear himrelative to other Arab nations and the West.
talk about the looming war with Saddam Hussein'sIran is a nation that must be dealt with, and soon.
Iraq: Will the United Nations serve the purpose ofThere can be no mistake about Ahmadinejad's
its founding, or will it be irrelevant? The currentquest for nuclear power and regional influence. He
impasse over Iran's nuclear ambitions may soondoes not take the United Nations seriously
provide the answer to the President's question.because he has repeatedly been witness to the
Almost immediately after the passing of a UNfutility of the Security Council when confronted
Security Council resolution demanding that Iranwith matters of grave importance. He has
halt its uranium enrichment activities by the endrejected the UN's call to halt his country's
of August, state radio services began reportingenrichment of uranium because he believes the
that the Council's demands would be rejected. Onfive permanent members of the Council will never
August 1, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejadcome to an agreement on either meaningful
officially denounced the resolution, insisting thatsanctions or the use of military force.
Tehran was committed to its pursuit of nuclearBy setting a deadline, the Security Council has
technology and would not be bullied by threatsdrawn its line in the sand. If Iran fails to stop
from the UN. Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Ariuranium enrichment activities by the end of
Larijani, went a step further, calling the UNAugust, the Council will convene once more to
resolution "illegal" and boasting that Iran would notdiscuss options for dealing with Ahmadinejad's
only defy the Council's wishes, but would increaseregime. But don't count on anything significant
its uranium enrichment activities as well.coming out of the Security Council's meetings.
There are two problems with Iran's "right" toTwo of the permanent five are already wavering,
pursue nuclear technology: the lack ofwith both the Chinese and Russian envoys
transparency provided by the hard-linedownplaying the threat of sanctions immediately
government and the threat posed by the Iranianafter the passing of the resolution. According to
regime itself. Both require the global community tothe Washington Post, the Russian and Chinese
confront Iran over its nuclear program.representatives say the main goal of the
Lack of transparency has been a decades-longresolution was to encourage Iran to resume
dilemma. Iran has consistently shrouded its nuclearnegotiations and to support the efforts by UN
plans in secrecy, and UN inspectors havenuclear experts to obtain greater cooperation
repeatedly been blocked from access to sites andfrom Tehran.
personnel involved in nuclear work. While Iran'sSadly, this type of political backtracking is typical
ambassador to the UN claims his country's nuclearof Security Council deliberations and a major
advances are no threat to peace and security inreason why the United Nations is largely
the world, the actions of his government make itineffective on global security issues. Countries
impossible to determine the intent and scope ofinitially stand together behind generic statements
nuclear progress. Without access to key atomicthat foster the perception of cooperation, but
facilities and players, there can be no crediblecoalitions quickly fracture when the strategic and
assurances that Iran's nuclear program is foreconomic interests of individual nations outweigh
peaceful energy production and not for thethe importance of consensus for the greater
development of nuclear weapons.global good. Inevitably, the UN will bog down yet
But none of this is should be a surprise. The veryagain in the face of Iranian nuclear development.
nature of the regime is itself a threat to otherAhmadinejad sees what President Bush sees: that
nations. The government is headed by a radicalthe weakness of the United Nations ultimately
former member of the Revolutionary Guard whomeans UN resolutions can be defied without
never misses an opportunity to call for theconsequence. If the UN fails to come together
destruction of Israel, or to spew hateful rhetoricnow, when global peace and security are
about the United States and the West. Iran is athreatened by a potentially nuclear-armed terrorist
leading state sponsor of terrorism with ties toregime dedicated to the destruction of the West,
Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and theit will once again demonstrate to the world that its
Palestine Liberation Organization. The regimemember nations cannot fulfill its founding purpose.
continually exerts its influence among Shiites inIt will become, as President Bush warned,
Iraq, Lebanon, and the Palestinian Territories,irrelevant.