Hackers, Deniers and Real Solutions to Global Warming

Recently there has been a controversy aboutpower, nuclear power, and biofuels; but there is a
hackers who hacked into the UN site dealing withtechnology that is superior to them all. It has not
climate change and found some data fudging andbeen in the news, but it should be. What if I were
sloppy research. Some have used that to claimto tell you that there is a technology that will
global warming to be a fraud. There is a problemprovide both the energy and the water needs of
with that. The UN body is just one out of manyhumanity, abundant, clean, round-the-clock,
bodies, academic, governmental, business, andon-demand, and unlimited, using a process that
private, that have evidence of global warming.only requires the sun and the ocean water and
And if some fools at UN have cut some corners,produces at the consumer end only clean energy
says nothing about the reality of global warming,and clean water to be recycled back into the
which has far more credible evidence behind itenvironment?
than what was provided by the UN.What if I were to tell you that this mechanism will
These people are now claiming global warming tohave twice the energy efficiency of the electric
be a fraud. Tell that to the people of Malawi andgrid; will end the burden on lakes, rivers and
Kiribati, whose countries are sinking into the seaground water resources; will replace two systems
as a result of the melting glaciers. Tell that to thewith one system, realizing huge economic benefit;
people of New Orleans. Tell that to the peopleand will allow oil resources to last longer and be
who died in Europe's heat waves and Australianused for more profitable higher-end goods?
forest fires. Tell that to the people in cities as bigWhat if I were to tell you that this technology
as Jakarta, that are now constantly being floodedhas been reviewed and found to be economically
as ocean waters rise.and technically feasible, and to be a vast
There are some who see these events as notimprovement over the status quo?
being related to carbon emissions and postulateThere is in fact such technology. It is called the
other explanations, such as natural weatherHydrogen Transmission Network (explained in
cycles. There is nothing cyclical about there beingdepth at ). In Hydrogen Transmission Network,
the highest amount of CO2 in the atmosphere insolar power will drive electrolysis of ocean water,
450,000 years. There is nothing natural aboutbreaking it down into Hydrogen and Oxygen.
ocean water becoming acidic and killing all the fish.Oxygen will be released into the air; hydrogen will
When one cuts down the forests and raisesbe sent through pipes to houses, offices, farms,
carbon emissions, the carbon dioxide has only twoand places of industry and commerce, to be
places to go to. One is the oceans, where itreacted using fuel cells with oxygen in the air to
makes the water acidic and no longercreate clean energy and clean water at once.
life-supporting. The other is the atmosphere,Hydrogen also will be piped to fueling stations to
where it reflects sun's rays from reflecting offpower hydrogen-based vehicles. All of humanity's
the earth's surface and into the outer space andwater and energy needs can be met through a
bounces them back to the earth's surface,process that takes nothing that can't be replaced
causing it to become hot. On planet Venus, whoseand creates nothing that is in any way harmful.
atmosphere is largely carbon dioxide, thisAnd since transmitting hydrogen through pipes is
greenhouse effect is so bad that its surfacealmost loss-free, this mechanism will have energy
temperatures are 500 degrees. And if this is notefficiency over twice that of the electric grid.
addressed now, then that's the direction in whichThere are other parts to solution that aren't
we are going.discussed much, but should be. Sahara is a vast
As for the people who are awaiting thedesert where no human or animal lives except in
Armageddon, I have hard news. Burning down theoases. It is not ecological anything; it is a
planet will not get you to heaven or anywheremanmade creation, put in place by Berbers who
near heaven. These people should not be eagerlyused slash-and-burn agriculture in what was then
awaiting the Armageddon; they should be terrifiedrainforest, much like the Brazilians are using
of it. They want to do away with their children'sslash-and-burn agriculture in the rainforest now.
future and their children's right to a livable world inRight now, Sahara is the most empty, most
order that they could themselves have theirworthless, most barren, stretch of land on the
selfish salvation. No god would look kindly on suchplanet. What if it were converted into forests and
a thing.farmland? How much CO2 would be taken out of
In 20AD, a Roman named Hero of Alexandriathe atmosphere, and how much food would be
invented the steam engine. The Romans thoughtproduced to feed the African people then?
that the slave labor was cheap enough, and thatHow much CO2 would be taken out of the
there was no need for this invention. If theyatmosphere, and how much human benefit would
thought ahead, they would have been able tobe realized, if the same is done to the deserts of
industrialize 1800 years early, abolish slavery, andArabia, Mongolia, Rajasthan, Australian Outback,
create military machines that would have madeand the parts of the American Southwest that
mincemeat of any invading army, and the worldwere deforested by the Anasazi?
would be speaking Latin to this day. Instead theyThese solutions not only realize benefit by
kept the horrible institution of slavery that wasreducing global warming. These solutions realize
the rightful source of resentment and hatredeconomic, technical, and environmental benefit in
against Roman Empire as well as the world, andthemselves. Even if there are other ways to
Roman Empire went down to flaming ruin. Thereaddress global warming, these solutions are
are now technologies available to meet all ofbeneficial both to humanity and to the
humanity's energy and water requirements inenvironment. It is intelligence that is the true
processes that are totally non-polluting. In choosingsaving grace of humanity. And with application of
to embrace these technologies, or to keep thereal intelligence, a viable future for humanity and
status quo, humanity faces similar choice but on athe planet can be on its way.
much larger scale.The solution to global warming is not denying it or
There are real solutions to global warming. And Imisrepresenting it any more than it is doing away
do not mean going to subsistence agriculture anywith the economy or the civilization. The real
more than I mean positive thinking or askingsolution to global warming is using better
Jesus or aliens to save us. I mean real, technicallytechnologies in place of the outdated technologies
and economically viable, technological solutions thatthat have created the disaster in the first place.
will allow people to keep all that they have whileOne stands to fear nothing from these solutions
drastically reducing the burden on the planet. Whatand has much to hope for from them.
solutions are these?It is time to put into place real solutions for global
Much has been written about solar power, windwarming.