Explosion In Nuclear Energy Demand Coming

: Sprott Asset Management uranium expert Kevinthe last 400,000 years. If you look at the work
Bambrough talked with us about the “secondof people like James Hanson, the correlation
leg” of the current uranium bull market. Hebetween CO2 levels and temperature is
sees a massive nuclear build up heading our wayundeniable. Basically, mankind has increased the
with “the environmentalists leading theCO2 levels beyond a level that hasn’t been
charge.” He said many price projections mayseen in over a million years. We are just starting
be inaccurate because “people areto see the weather impacts. There are problems
underestimating future demand.”with droughts across the world as well as
StockInterview: Price forecasts on spot uraniumelevated hurricane activity. Going nuclear on a
are widening. Some insiders have predictedmass scale is starting to become recognized as
uranium prices may drop back into the $30/poundone of the only ways to have a real impact. I
range; others, such as yourself, continue tothink what we’re going to see is an
suggest $50/pound or higher. Any comments onunprecedented build out in nuclear capacity
the forecasts others are making?throughout the world in the coming years and
Kevin Bambrough:decades. I’d equate this to what happened
There are many people forecasting uranium priceswhen we went from using oil for just lamps and
now. It’s important to consider their trackhome heating to using it as a transportation fuel.
record of forecasting prices. Look at theWhat’s going to happen with the people
contracts that have been written by manywho have the higher quality uranium reserves and
companies in the industry, over the last numberlower cost production? They are going to be able
of years. Anyone who had ceilings, or had signedto reap massive profits over the coming decades.
fixed-priced contracts, has been punished. VeryStockInterview: Looking ahead, do you think
few people in the industry predicted what haswe’ll see more deals between a small
happened. Looking forward, I think that in oururanium producer, such as Uranium Resources
view, the cost of production of current producers(OTC BB: URRE) and the Japanese multi-national
isn’t going to be as relevant as it has beenconglomerate, Itochu Corporation?
in the past. It will be the more marginal, muchKevin Bambrough:
higher cost producers who will be setting theI have no doubt that it’s going to continue
price.to happen. More importantly, I’ve heard
StockInterview: Isn’t there a sense ofthat some of the major builders of nuclear
false optimism that “projects in the pipeline”facilities around the world, companies such as
will ensure an ongoing stream of uranium oxideAreva are quite concerned about the availability of
for the nuclear fuel cycle?supply going forward. When these companies are
Kevin Bambrough:talking to countries and utilities that potentially
There are a lot of people looking at the supplycould contract to build nuclear facilities,
situation going forward while underestimatingthey’re basically being told that buyers
future demand. They are very optimistic thatwant uranium supply assurances, or they
mining projects are going to go as planned. Wearen’t going to give an order to buy a
had recent news that Cigar Lake had a problem.nuclear facility. I’ve heard they are looking
There was a flood the. There’s a coupleto do joint ventures or at least contract with
million pounds shortfall to most people’semerging producers to try to get future supply.
models for at least two years. All because of oneThen, they will be able sell their nuclear technology
mine’s six month delay.to countries and ensure supply.
StockInterview: Would that have the kind ofStockInterview: Will the Chinese be satisfied with
impact the McArthur flooding (Athabasca Basin,the uranium they plan to buy from Australia, or
Cameco) had on the spot uranium price a fewwill they have to tap into uranium production from
years ago?another or other countries?
Kevin Bambrough:Kevin Bambrough:
I think it could. It was forecast to go up to 18I think that the Chinese will probably look
million pounds of production. That would haveelsewhere as well. Countries have strategic oil
been ten percent of the world’s currentreserves. Why shouldn’t they have
consumption. Cigar Lake would need to ramp upstrategic uranium reserves to supply their nuclear
over a three year period, once it gets started.reactors? It makes sense to have a good
Now, there is a six month delay. What ifstockpile of uranium considering the relative cost
it’s delayed a year? That really changesof nuclear power versus anything else. I
the production profile for the next decade. Theredon’t think that the nuclear power industry
are many projects that could see delays. Theshould operate on a just in time basis, considering
mining business is always full of delays. Rememberthe costs and the risks of making sure you can
that when we bring on new nuclear plants, theysecure supply. Don’t get me wrong. There
take on average about 1.6 million lbs whenis plenty of uranium in the world, but we’re
commissioning. What will happen, if in a decade,just going to have to pay up for it. I believe
we bring on just 10 or 20 reactors each year?we’re going to consume lot more than
That’s another 16 to 30 million pounds perwhat we’re consuming nowadays —
year of demand just because of the start up.a decade or two out. The world is waking up to
StockInterview: Does this mean the currentthe reality of peak oil production, and how it is
uranium bull market still has strong legs?going to affect all aspects of energy production.
Kevin Bambrough:StockInterview: How much of a factor will Russia
I think we’re entering the second leg ofplay in the nuclear build up?
the bull market here. It is going to move awayKevin Bambrough:
from a supply shortage story, where we focusLooking at some of the recent statements made
on the fact that we only get about 60 percent ofby Russian officials, it’s completely clear to
the current consumption from mines, while theme that we’ve been correct in what
inventories are being worked off. Now,we’ve been thinking for a long time: the
we’re moving into a situation whereHEU agreement (to deliver highly enriched uranium
we’re seeing an explosion in demandand have it blended down) is probably not going
growth. Just a couple of years ago when we firstto be renewed. The Russians are planning to
started investing in uranium, we could seemake nuclear technology a key export for them,
probably about a dozen nuclear facilities beingreally as a value added product to go with
planned for construction throughout the world.uranium production. They desire to be able to
Now we’ve got well over 100 beingoffer a complete solution, not just uranium, but
planned. It seems there are new additions and talkthe actual building and technology around the
of more additions every day.nuclear facilities themselves. They will also have
StockInterview: How you envision this nucleargrowing uranium demands domestically and have
buildup rolling out?voiced concern about being able to meet their
Kevin Bambrough:own needs beyond 2015.
I don’t think it’s unreasonable toStockInterview: But nuclear energy critics claim all
think, looking ten to twenty years out, there areof these power plants won’t secure
going to be a lot of countries that will be trying tofinancing and most plans are just pipe dreams
get in the position that France is in, with a muchnever to be built.
higher percentage of their power coming fromKevin Bambrough:
nuclear generation. We could see a move toTwo years ago, the critics said there would never
where maybe 50 percent of global energybe any more nuclear plants built in the U.S. People
production or more could eventually be suppliedused to say nuclear was over for Germany, and
by nuclear. There is nothing else that can reallythat many countries would exit nuclear power.
step up and fill the void and take care of thisNow we’re seeing the exact opposite.
problem that we’re having. FranceWe’re seeing proposals being done,
produces 78 percent of their electricity fromincentives put in place, and a multitude of projects
nuclear. Why isn’t that reasonable formoving ahead. If what the leading scientists from
others? Look out a decade or two, and itNASA, the NOAA and from many organizations
doesn’t appear like we’re going toaround the world are saying about global warming,
have the oil and the gas in order to handle ourand the acceleration we’ve recently seen
needs. Obviously we can do more with coal, but ifcontinues, people are going to be begging to have
we’re going to keep using coalmore nuclear facilities and cut CO2 emissions. The
we’ve got to put in place technology toenvironmentalists will be leading the charge.
take care of the carbon dioxide sequestration. IfStockInterview: How long will it take before the
you want to have a stable, secure supply ofproposed nuclear build up impacts the uranium
electricity, it seems that you’re going tomining companies?
have to go with more nuclear or eventually withKevin Bambrough:
these new coal technologies. I think there is goingThe actual build of all this takes time. I think the
to have to be a balance of both, because the oilincrease in the positive perception, of the nuclear
and gas just isn’t going to be there.industry is going to continue to accelerate. All
StockInterview: What do you think is the catalystdemand for uranium can come from just the
for this anticipated growth in nuclear energyplanning stage for nuclear power plants, as
demand?companies look forward and try to contract
Kevin Bambrough:future supply. Ultimately, that’s what will
The most interesting thing is the fact that somekeep driving the uranium price higher.
environmentalists are leading the charge to goStockInterview: How seriously is the nuclear
more nuclear. It’s because they realizeindustry taking the global build up?
nuclear energy is the only practical alternative andKevin Bambrough:
because of the situation with the carbon dioxideI think the industry is starting to take it very
(CO2) levels. There have been some recentseriously. That’s why the uranium price
reports about CO2 levels reaching 381 parts perkeeps pushing higher. People are going around
billion, just spiking out of the range that has kepttrying to contract for uranium, and they are
the world in a relatively stabile environment forfinding it more difficult.