Closing Oyster Creek - The Nations Oldest Nuclear Power Plant

Oyster Creek, the nation's oldest commercialwatchdogs of the 40-year-old plant. The fact
nuclear power plant, began operating in 1969 andthey have been destroyed, assuming they
is literally rotting at its core. Experts say thatexisted in the first place, heightens concerns that
Oyster Creek is past its time and the plant'sthe application review process was flawed.
design is unsafe. Its existing license will expire nextExelon, the corporation that owns Oyster Creek,
April, however, a 20-year license renewal isfailed to meet an NRC requirement and disposed
currently undergoing appeals, which - if passed,of water leakage without testing it for
would allow Oyster Creek to run until 2029.contamination. An NRC inspection report notes
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hastheir failure to monitor water runoff, but does not
the authority to determine whether Oyster Creektake enforcement action against Exelon. "NRC's
can renew their license. The NRC is the federaloffering of endless last chances to Oyster Creek
agency in charge of regulating the nuclear industryfor repeated violations is a dangerous dodge of its
to ensure that safety codes are met.regulatory responsibility," said Paul Gunter of
Rutgers Law Clinic attorney Richard Webster hasNuclear Information and Resource Service.
filed a court challenge to suspend the re-licensingThe NRC and Exelon's failure to act on possible
plan. Webster believes the government'scorrosion on the drywell liner is symptomatic of
re-licensing process limits public input and largelylarger problems, according to a coalition of six
ignores pressing safety issues at aging plants. "Wewatchdog groups. If the drywell liner were to
hope that the NRC will wake up and protectcorrode enough, in the event of a nuclear
people and not the interests of the nuclearaccident, it could threaten over one million people.
industry," he states.Throughout Oyster Creek's relicensing process,
In defense of NRC re-licensing procedures, NRCattempts to gather information about its safety
Chairman Dale Klein says the NRC insists thathave repeatedly been refused or obstructed by
plants seeking a 20-year extension operate "justred tape. "We cannot rely on Exelon to tell us the
as safely as they have been."truth about Oyster Creek or follow commitments
At a recent hearing, Klein said, "Each re-licensingkey to its safety," said Adam Garber, Consumer
application is thoroughly reviewed, and NRC staffAdvocate for New Jersey Public Interest
members spend more than 10,000 hours perResearch Group. "Without that assurance, we are
reactor." He added that the NRC is followingletting Exelon and the NRC roll the dice with
through on improvement recommendations issuedOyster Creek, and it will be New Jersey residents
last year by the agency's in-house watchdog,who pay the debt."
Inspector General Hubert Bell. In his writtenEconomic Benefits to Plant Closing There will be
testimony, Bell said "the re-licensing process hasmore money circulating in the economy after
shortcomings. NRC inspectors don't alwaysOyster Creek shuts down. AmerGen will spend
independently verify information provided byaround $650 million over a 10-year period to clean
nuclear plant operators and sometimes fail toup the site. They will employ around 300 workers,
ensure that the plants implement NRC-requiredmostly unionized. The site will eventually be used
steps before license renewals."by some business that will generate economic
New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg requested aactivity, employ people and pay taxes.
hearing with the NRC, where he criticized theirSecurity and Spent fuel
procedures, citing an Inspector General reportThe NRC required plants to spend billions after the
that said the NRC "probably" does safety analysis9/11 terrorist attacks. Unfortunately, the NRC
as part of the re-licensing process. "Theneglected unprotected spent fuel pools. If the
communities surrounding the Oyster Creek facilityplant continues to operate, the amount of spent
cannot rely on 'probably,'" Lautenberg said in afuel stored there will continue to accumulate.
statement. "The NRC has an obligation to conductNew Jersey Gov. Corzine requested a review of
real oversight of the nation's nuclear plants."the Oyster Creek emergency plan, which was not
This year an audit of the license renewal processdone. Apparently, the plan has not considered the
by the Inspector General found that informationconsequences of a spent fuel pool attack. Lacey
provided in NRC safety evaluation reports wasTownship will have the spent fuel for a very long
identical, or nearly identical, to the correspondingtime. Most of it will remain in a pool of water,
applications, casting doubt on whether the NRCnever designed as a storage facility, 100 feet
independently reviewed the applications.above the ground, with only sheet metal between
Disturbed by the findings, the Inspector Generalit and you. The safest course of action is to close
reviewed how the NRC staff prepared theOyster Creek, remove all the spent fuel from the
reports documenting their assessments at fourspent fuel pool, put it in safety canisters, and
nuclear plants, including Oyster Creek. Accordingforce the Energy Department to take it all away
to a recent memo from the Inspector General's- but where?
Office, the audit revealed that applicationDennis Zannoni, former chief nuclear engineer for
documents and working papers used to supportthe NJ Department of Environmental Protection
the review and approval of the application werehas stated, "I have been involved with Oyster
destroyed by NRC staff. "Consequently," theCreek for 20 years. My goal was to do what I
memo concluded, "the failure to retain applicantcould to make the plant safer. Oyster Creek's
documents and NRC working papers made ittime is up. Close it, clean up the site and ready
difficult to verify specific details of staff on-sitethe property for the next business. Zannoni was
review activities." In other words, it wasreassigned from his position as chief nuclear
impossible to determine whether the reviewsengineer of the DEP last year in response to what
were done properly.he says is an unspecified complaint from an NRC
The supporting documents prepared during on-sitestaffer. He has said it may take a march to close
reviews would likely have been subpoenaed bythe plant.