Are We Serious About Fuel Alternatives?

As you can see from some of our previousthe pistons or block. Piston technology is, in its
articles, government agencies predict about 40primitive sense, the same design for the last 100
years of petroleum still remains. As usage climbs,years when steam coursed through the cylinders
the amount of time remaining may shrink eveninstead of fuel explosion force. Air-fuel ratios are
more. New reserves will be found, but developingthe biggest hurdle in engine conversions, and
countries, such as we're seeing in China with theircomputerized sensors would allow a slow
industrial revolution taking place, will demandchangeover without interruptions. By being able to
greater volumes of petroleum to supply energysense what fuel is being used, engines could run
needs.on ethanol/gasoline for gas engines, or diesel
People under 50 years of age should bebiodiesel for diesel engines, with any proportions,
considering this phenomenon as a potentiallyand switch back and forth.
life-changing circumstance. For most of us, thereWhile some may envision a whiskey still in
is little we can do except watch events play out,everyone's backyard, that is far from realistic.
and perhaps vote when the opportunity arises.Americans enjoy their plush way of life, and
Our industries must step up to the plate to meetexpect to pull up to a fuel pump anywhere in their
the task at hand.travels and fill up their tank. Only the fuel
Since the first petroleum shortages of the 70's,mega-companies are up to the task of maintaining
some groups have come to the forefront tosuch presence. So with all likelihood, the future of
inform others about the dangers and difficultiesalternative fuel manufacturing still lies with major
we will face. Few took them seriously. Radicalpetro-producers.
groups made drastic lifestyle changes to reduceSome experts have said that alternative fuels are
their own fuel consumption, and hoped that"unfeasible". Perhaps a true statement when
others would follow suit.looking at the bottom line profit, but as petroleum
Not likely.prices rise, this gap closes, and may reach a point
However, these groups are and have beenwhere feasibility is achieved. Corporations will
dedicated to spreading the word to the public thatmake the jump when this gap is closed.....it's a
we are running out of fuel as we know it. It won'tsimple buck to them. It will be important that the
be today, nor next week, nor even 10 yearsAmerican community at large supports such
from now. Maybe it's 80 years from now, but allconversions with their capital stock investments,
signs and reports indicate we are running out.and with their patronage. In other words, be willing
Social Security also has 40 years of successfulto burn an alternative fuel.
operation, but the Bush Administration has clearlyAlong the lines of feasibility, how about making it
taken on the task of "fixing social security",feasible for farmers to produce high-oil crops, or
because in about 40 years it's going to crash too,crops for fuel? Millions of acres in the Midwest lay
according to administrative estimates.idle, because the government programs that pay
We suggest that fuel alternatives are even morefarmers NOT to grow crops are more lucrative
important than social security.than the potential profit of growing them. For the
Without fuel----and MASSIVE quantities of it--- thisfarmer, it is also a simple buck. So if the
nation will dry up like a sand dune. Operations ofgovernment is going to invest tax dollars in these
most business will cease, and we'll be returned tooperations, how about paying a farmer TO
the pre-industrial age. Keep vaccinating the horseGROW a crop used for fuel? At least this would
population for West Nile Virus.....we may needallow such acreage payments to be a benefit to
them for transportation.the country......perhaps the world, by moving slowly
It is our belief, although we have no solidtoward independence with regard to fuel
evidence, that fuel companies are squarely behindproduction.
the petroleum pumps, and the scare is playedElectrical power generation is another large
very low-key. Huge profits exist where a productconsumer of energy. Nuclear, coal, and
can simply be drawn from the ground, and withhydroelectric make up the bulk of this grid, but
one refining process, produce gasoline, diesel fuel,wind power is beginning to make significant
propane, methane, etc. from the run. It is by far,additions as well. In the last website we reviewed,
the cheapest present alternative for largeelectricity from wind power is at about 6%.
companies. All corporate companies are dollarThere is tremendous opportunity to increase the
driven, and so it makes perfect sense for themcontributions of electrical power via wind and
to continue using petroleum. Our government hashydro. Because the amounts of power needed
committed more resources than we can everare so great, wind farms and hydroelectric dams
afford, to secure and protect our overseasare huge development projects, which can have a
interests where petroleum is abundant.great impact on the landscape and surrounding
If new massive volumes of petroleum areenvironment. Environmentalists that reject such
located, it will alleviate some of the crisis for theproposals need to give themselves a reality
time being. But this looming crisis will never gocheck, and come to grips with the size of the
away. It is imperative that government beginproblems America faces.
providing the means for business of all sizes toYes, hydro and wind will impact the environment.
develop alternative fuel strategies. GovernmentYes, we'll kill some birds. And yes, some fish (lots
does at present provide some incentives, in taxof fish) will be re-navigated because of
breaks, informational support, and even grants,hydroelectric dams. But no American......not even
but more can be done. Investing large quantitiesan environmentalist.....is willing to give up their
of time and money into the research andcomputer, their hair dryer, their car, their massive
development of alternatives is crucial.amounts of printer paper, their telephones, their
As supplies dwindle, this ever-growing concern willcell phones, their lovely homes.....well, you get the
do just that. It will grow. Oil companies willidea. So the impact to the planet if we do NOT
continue to lobby Congress, and place propagandadevelop these technologies is significantly worse.
in the public eye to insure them that everything isNo one will willingly return to the stone age, so
OK......just buy oil. But at the same time, theany and every fossil fuel will be seized, stolen, or
concern about dwindling supplies, and thewarred after to make the power.....at far greater
subsequent raise in prices for petroleum fuels willenvironmental harm. It is more likely that America
begin to catch the attention of the general public.would bomb itself back into the stone age over
At present, the best bet for alternative,the last drop of oil rather than "conserve" or
renewable fuels appears to exist with ethanol,adapt the livestyle of Laura Ingalls Wilder.
biodiesel, and the newest addition to the list,We believe that true energy freedom will not be
hydrogen fuel cells. But full compatibility withacquired until our energy is produced from
regard to motors and machinery will require somerenewables within our borders.
changes in manufacturing. Since most newMega-consolidators will still hold the reins to
vehicles are now monitored by computerizedalternative energies. They'll still have their lobbyists,
equipment, governments need to encourageand a lot of money in their coffers. However, the
engine manufacturers to engineer and developAmerican Dream will still live on. Our way of life
computerized motors that can determine a fueldepends upon the procurement and distribution of
mix, ethanol, gasoline, biodiesel, etc. and makeaffordable energy. Only with public support and
adjustments to the fuel burning mix at thethe encouragement of Congress can businesses
injection point. Few changes would be needed ondevelop the systems needed to make it happen.