Al Gore's Inconvenient Infomercial: A Movie Review - Part Two

The film shows images of a nuclear reactor, agood buddy of Josef Stalin and his Kremlin
wind farm and running water. Was the blusteringsuccessors. Hammer's dad introduced Little
Al or his bewildered movie director hoping theArmand to Stalin, who helped him build the
audience would choose a solution for them? AtHammer Empire. All this in return for one small
least Ross Perot, in his infomercials, had somefavor: Julius Hammer founded the U.S. Communist
solution for the ills then facing America. Al hasParty.
none. Zippo. Nada. Just join Al's crusade and startHave the sins of the father visited the son? For
driving a hybrid car. Or did he mean a bicycle?the past thirty or forty years, Al Gore has
After all, in one scene, Al boasts about theallegedly received a "mining royalty" check from
Chinese riding their bicycles and flashes a datedOccidental Petroleum for zinc ore discovered on
photo showing this. Wake up, Al, last we heard,the Gore family property. Reportedly, Al has been
the Chinese were driving Beemers and Benzes,paid about $20,000 annually for mining rights to
not bicycles. Bikes are reserved forthe property. But, that's just chump change. Long
environmentalist weenies who can't find a real job.before the Buddhist Temple fund-raising fiasco in
Al seems to be pro-nuclear, but claims there areLos Angeles, Al Gore was involved in dubious
problems with proliferation and waste disposal. Inpolitical financings.
an interview with Australia's The Age newspaper,We didn't look that much more deeply into Al
published in November 2005, Gore told theGore. Truthfully, why bother? Gore's remorse
reporter he was not "reflexively against" nuclearappears rigged; his acting is pathetic. For example,
energy. Wearing his hat as a fund manager forhis sister died of lung cancer, before the family
the Generation Fund, he told the newspaper thatstopped growing tobacco. He makes a really big
investing in uranium mining comes down todeal about this in his movie (despite his own
sustainability. In another interview with "Gristalleged chain-smoking habits as a college student).
Magazine's" David Roberts, published in May of thisBut he failed to mention he continued receiving
year, Gore responded to questioning about theroyalties from his tobacco farm for years after
nuclear energy renaissance, saying, " I doubthis sister died.
nuclear power will play a much larger role than itGore also forgot his vivid 1988 presidential election
does now." How's that for naiveté in thecampaign speeches, defending tobacco farmers in
context of dozens of countries having alreadythe southern United States. Imagine Mr. Clean
announced their plans to advance their nucleartelling tobacco farmers about how he, himself,
energy programs?tilled the soil with his bare hands and picked dem
Perhaps, Gore will begin touting renewables, asdar tobacco leaves wit his own fingers! Our
Hillary Clinton has done on behalf of lapdog/energyresearch shows Gore continued accepting
guru Amory Lovins. We asked third-termcampaign donations from tobacco companies until
Wyoming legislator, David R. Miller, who is alsoat least 1990. Instead of being truthful with his
president of a U.S. uranium developmentaudience, Gore mentioned in passing that the
company, Strathmore Minerals, about thereason he ran for President in 1988 was to give
madness over renewables becoming a seriousGlobal Warming some exposure. Hypocrisy or
factor for baseload electricity generation. Miller toldambivalence? You decide.
us, "We were 100 percent renewable 300 yearsIn his film, Gore claimed to have changed the way
ago, 50 percent renewable 100 years ago and 30he performed his congressional duties after his
percent renewable 50 years ago. Now, we aresix-year old son was hit by a car and nearly died.
less than 10 percent renewable and shrinking fast."Throughout his movie, Gore uses every personal
About nuclear energy, Miller added, "It nearlytragedy to play upon the audience's heart strings.
unlimited. We are learning to use betterWhat does that have to do with Global Warming?
technology to make purer energy to do more forNothing, but it aids and abets an otherwise
us." Miller's rebuttal on Al Gore's message wasinsincere politician to better sell his purported
emphatic, "Those that preach about saving thesincerity concerning abrupt climate change. The
earth should practice what they speak, but themessage is good; the messenger needs to take
loudest voices are those that consume the most."up a new hobby. Like unsuccessfully running for
Miller pointed out, "Only the rich and idle have timepresident again so he can finally get his just
to rail against too much consumption. But theydeserves: "Strike Three, you're outa here!"
want you to stop the consuming, not them."Why pay good money to get bored out of your
One could look deeper to better understand Alskull with this blasé movie? Save the $7
Gore's ambiguity toward any solution. Forto $10 (or more) on "Al Gore's Inconvenient
example, is Al Gore's family still a largeInfomercial" by reading the same stuff for no
shareholder of Occidental Petroleum? After all, hischarge whatsoever (and without the
father took a consultancy with a subsidiary of thedeep-thinking, brooding ex-politician who spends
multi-national oil firm, upon leaving the U.S. Senatenearly all of his 100 minutes preaching in your
in 1970. Just in time to cash in on the oil embargoface). Kevin Bambrough and Eric Sprott wrote a
of 1973, Al Gore's dad was paid $500,000 perdetailed report, covering a great deal, if not more
year for his services. Al Gore Sr. also served as athan what the Gore movie attempted to discuss.
company director. Why was Al Gore's father onCOPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc.
such great terms with Armand Hammer, theALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
founder of Occidental Petroleum? Hammer was a