A Case For Coal

In a perfect world the planet's energy sourceash."o Two types of fly ash exist: Class F and
would be generated from an infinite or renewableClass C, usually referred to as fly ash and bottom
source not a finite source, and its by-productash respectively.o Bottom ash is used as
would have beneficial reuses rather than haveaggregate in road construction and building
harmful effects to human or environmental health.foundations.o Fly ash is used in supplementing the
However, the world is not perfect, nor is nuclearcreation of concrete and as filler in asphalt.
or coal power energy. Though much research isCoal Ash and Drinking Water
going into other renewable sources of energy,Bizhan Sheikholeslami, an environmental engineer
neither coal nor nuclear plant technologies will likelywho specializes in fly ash regulations with the
go away any time soon given the vastWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, said
infrastructure already in place for thesethat the quality of the coal and the type of
technologies and the capital investment involved.coal-fired boiler used in the process will determine
Thus, environmental policy and priorities shouldthe quality and waste characterization of the fly
rate coal and nuclear power with respect to theash. In general, however, he professes that after
damages each causes to the environment, towater leachate tests are performed on bottom
human health, and to the future security of onesash only trace levels of barium, boron, iron, and
surroundings. The by-product of an energy sourcemagnesium were detected from two local boilers
and the threats it poses to ones security is theand were well within drinking water standards.
linchpin in rating the difference between coal andFly ash has more metals than bottom ash
nuclear energy plants.however. Bizhan's report on fly ash revealed high
The recent spill of coal ash from the Tennesseelevels of metals but significantly lower levels of
Valley Authority's (TVA) coal fired plant thatmetals after the leachate test was performed.
impacted 300 acres and the Tennessee River onLevels of aluminum, barium, boron, and
December 22nd is a case in point that has manymolybdenum were detected that exceeded
questioning the credibility and application of coaldrinking water standards in one particular case he
fired plants in the United States. Green Peaceposed. Therefore, water treatment plants must
recently cited that coal ash is a hazardous andbe cognizant of these threats in Tennessee and
toxic waste and sensationalized and distorted theshould take extra care in making sure these
facts about this spill. Let us get the facts straightmetals are removed from drinking source.
about coal ash.Coal Ash and the Environment
Although coal ash has metals and organics that atStoring fly ash next to a sensitive natural
specific levels could be classified as hazardous,environment, such as a river, is not a sustainable
coal ash however, is not classified as a hazardousenvironmental choice and the risks associated with
or toxic waste stream. The reason for this is thatsuch should be measured. The aftermath of a
coal ash, commonly referred to as fly ash orcoal ash spill and the impacts that large quantity
bottom ash, is predominately made up of calcium,spills have on the environment have some
which has a binding capacity. When mixed withimplications to the benthos community or the
water, the metals that leach from fly ash arebottom of the water body where invertebrates
nearly insignificant because the calcium locks orand aquatic food sources are for smaller fish such
binds the metals in place in large part preventingas minnows. Minnows are food sources to larger
the metals from being free floating or suspendedfish and some concern may develop over time
particles that could otherwise be harmful toregarding the increase of metals in the food chain.
aquatic and human health.Coal Ash Spill Compared to Nuclear Spill
Leachate tests are performed on waste streamsWhen comparing updated coal fired plants spills to
to determine how harmful or hazardous a wastethe disaster of a nuclear plant spill the differences
stream can be. An EPA test called Toxicityare diabolically on opposite ends of the risk
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) is a testspectrum. The TVA coal ash spill impacted 300
used to characterize waste streams as hazardousacres and no obvious deaths of aquatic life, at
or non-hazardous and determines the potential ofleast not yet, and some concerns regarding
a waste stream to leach into the ground water.drinking water, but nothing that cannot be treated.
Coal ash, because of its binding capacity, is clearlyOn the other hand, the failure of one nuclear
not a hazardous or toxic waste because thereactor, namely the Chernobyl disaster, resulted in
metals do not leach into the water table at levelsa plume of radioactive particulate to traverse
that pose a threat to human and environmentalover western Soviet Union, Europe, and parts of
health.eastern North America, which was 400 times
Facts about Coal Asho Coal ash is not alarger than the Hiroshima fallout. The number of
hazardous or toxic waste.o Coal ash is partlypeople highly exposed reached 600,000, 4000 of
comprised of lime and when mixed with waterwhich were estimated deaths due to cancer that
acts as a binding material and is used in makingfollowed. The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, 23 years
concrete.o Coal ash is usually referred to as "flylater is still off limits to people.