Nuclear Energy - The Green Solution

The United States with less than 5% of theof our energy needs. Historically, at least, the
world's population consumes roughly 25% of theproblem with nuclear energy has been primarily
world's energy. Some might argue that this istwo fold. First, the "China Syndrome" problem of
egregious, while others would say that it is simplya meltdown of a reactor which could release a
a yardstick by which the world's largest economylarge amount of radioactivity and second, what do
is measured. But for whatever the reason for ourwe do with nuclear waste material that has a
vast consumption of energy, the fact remainshalf-life of over 25,000 years! The perception of
that in order to consume you first have tothese two significant obstacles might doom a new
produce. And as most of our energy comes fromnuclear drive and stand in the way of an
burning fossil fuels- which wouldn't be too badenergy-independent United States.However, there
except that:are new technologies in this field that, like the
burning vast amounts of fossil fuels in this countycavalry, have come to our rescue- and none too
alone dumps millions of pounds of earth warmingsoon. First, there is a new class of nuclear
greenhouse gasses into, what appears, is a fragilereactors that have their nuclear fuel so structured
atmosphere, every day. Just warming up thethat they cannot do a melt down. Turn off the
atmosphere a couple of degrees on average hascooling to this new nuclear reactor and it only
significant impact. Look no further than last year'sgets a bit hotter. No big deal. Turn the cooling
hurricane season. The worst on record. And...let'sback on and it runs more efficiently. Okay, one
not forget its close cousin; smog pollution, whichdown. But what about all that radioactive spent
adds to respiratory problems and other healthreactor fuel? Let's see if we can put some
conditions, not to mention the visual blight hangingperspective on it. If you gathered all the spent
over our cities as well. In addition...have you fillednuclear fuel in this country under one roof it would
your tank recently? Paid the heating bill? The costfill a typical high school gym. Not too
of all fossil fuels, even coal has increasedunmanageable. Moreover, the spent fuel is
significantly. As other emerging economies such asencapsulated in super strong glass beads, which in
China and India vie for ever more limitedturn are embedded into hardened concrete inside
resources, all bets are that the costs will continuesteel drums. This makes the waste product
to climb over the long haul. Moreover...as we"transportable" and is designed to withstand the
import most of our oil nowadays- we areelements for 10,000 years. Nevertheless, even in
increasingly held hostage to an unstable supplyit's tomb it is still relativity radioactive. Most of
from a number of countries that we, forthese drums are stored in water as radiation
whatever reasons, are increasingly unpopular with.cannot penetrate more than about 3 feet of
The end game? If our supply of oil is not firstwater. However, no one seems anxious to have
arbitrarily cut off, as it becomes increasinglyit in their back yards. A political hot potato to be
scarce the price will rise until our growth issure.But while our politicians don't have the
strangled. In either case we will feel impelled toanswer, the earth does. The answer lies in the
engage in war with other rising powers to securebottom of the Marianas Trench in the Pacific. It is
our supplies.the deepest place in the ocean (over seven miles)
and one of the fastest moving subduction plates
The bottom line: Fossil fuels are not onlyon earth. If the drums of waste were placed in
hazardous to our health (and the planet's) butthe bottom of the trench, they would, within a
may in fact be hazardous to the American wayfew hundred years, be swallowed up into the
of life.But if energy is the lifeblood of ourbowels of the earth and blend into the earth's
economy what are we to do? Wind? Solar? Whilecore where heat and pressure (caused in part by
anything we can do other than consume fossilradioactive substances contained within the earth)
fuels will help, these sources of energy arerendered insignificant.Given the current geopolitical
relatively diffuse and inconsistent. In other words,situation, which only seems to be working to our
their "cost to calorie" ratios are not efficient anddisadvantage, limited resources for cheap fossil
they are not always dependable. As Jamesfuels, not to mention the environmental impacts
Kunstler points out in his intriguing book The Longwe are starting to experience, it is time we take
Emergency, one of our best options out of thesedrastic measures to get us off our fossil fuel
dilemmas is to do an "Apollo Project" type effortaddition. Let's hope we are not too late.John Woolf
to develop additional, new nuclear energyis the founder of several successful Internet
capability. As it turns out, it just may be thetechnology companies including the Book Price
greenest, viable alternate we have.The U.S.Comparison website As a pragmatist of the world
currently produces about 20% of its electricalaround him, he is both a critic and crusader on
power from nuclear power. The advantages are;international politics and energy policy as it relates
that there are no greenhouse emissions into theto our security and our impact on the global
atmosphere, no visual pollution, it is cost relativelyenvironment.Visit to read reviews, find similar
cost effective, quiet and we have sufficienttitles, and search for the lowest possible price for
supply of uranium here at home for theThe Long Emergency and other great books.
foreseeable future to provide for a major portion