| Will the first world nations have to stop
| |
| | things.The United States as much as we
|
| testing advanced nuclear weapons in order
| |
| | would like too, cannot get rid of its
|
| to coax third world nations from
| |
| | nuclear arsenal or stop the further
|
| developing nuclear weapons and into
| |
| | development of more strategic nuclear
|
| signing nuclear peace accords?Can the
| |
| | weapons if it is to survive in a world
|
| first world nations afford not to have
| |
| | with emerging nations with fundamental
|
| nuclear weapons to stop a rogue nation
| |
| | extremist leadership. Leadership which
|
| like Iran which threatened to blow Israel
| |
| | threatens to break ranks with all
|
| off the map, sends insurgents into
| |
| | peaceful nations of the world, threaten
|
| neighboring nations and then chooses to
| |
| | them and eventually use nuclear weapons
|
| support International Terrorist
| |
| | to prove a point.Indeed the day they do,
|
| organizations like Hamas?It is
| |
| | their point of their fundamentalism is a
|
| interesting that to stop a nation from
| |
| | mute point in that, it will no longer
|
| doing the unthinkable you are almost
| |
| | matter who was right and who was wrong,
|
| forced to do the unthinkable yourself.
| |
| | the damage is done forever and at that
|
| Yet every nation including Israel has the
| |
| | point, well it is just too late. I hope
|
| right to protect its self from such
| |
| | you will consider all this in 2006.
|