Should a Global Climate Agreement Hold the US to a Higher Environmental Standard

Yes, the US should be held to a higherrequested budget and the suggested Green
environmental standard than the rest of theBudget, but one would suspect that the Green
world. We have benefited from a superiorBudget is closer to our needs if we wish to
economic growth powered by consumption of aassume a leadership role in environmental
major share of the world's fossil fuels, causing astandards.
major share of the world's environmental pollution.Climate change is the major issue within the
We are technically equipped to lead toward aCongress and should present a major showdown
higher environmental standard. Currently,on the proposed energy budget. Democrats and
however, it would be a major challenge for theRepublicans in both the House and Senate are
US to assume this leadership role. We will have todrafting major bills to reduce greenhouse gas
wait for a new administration that, hopefully, willemission through "cap and trade" systems. These
want this role for us.bills would make billions of dollars to stimulate
The Bush administration has continued to rejectdevelopment of cleaner energy sources. The
actions to reduce global warming pollution. It hasmajor presidential contenders for the upcoming
refused to require cuts in heat-trapping carbonelection, Democratic Senators Clinton and Obama
dioxide pollution, significantly raise fuel economyand Republican Senator McCain, also support the
requirements, or hold companies accountable for"cap and trade" systems. In addition, Senator
improving their energy efficiency using wind, solarClinton wants to tighten fuel economy standards
and other renewable energy sources.more than Congress did last year so that an
In his final FY2009 budget request, President Bushaverage vehicle will go 55 miles per gallon by
accurately reflected his administration's low priority2030. Senator McCain sees nuclear power as a big
for environmental help. Again, President Bushpart of the environmental pollution solution.
stripped critical funds protecting America'sAggressive environmental leadership should
communities and natural resources, and insteademerge from the upcoming Presidential election.
rewarded dirty industries. All of this followed hisHowever, it will take the strong and concerted
State of the Union Address touting hisefforts of the future President and Congress to
commitment to advance clean, renewablemove the USA to the forefront of environmental
resources and reduce dependence on oil. A quotestandards. There is a great watershed between
from President Bush' speech on energy was "Thethe mainstream technologies that make up the
United States is committed to strengthening ourmodern energy industry and the newer "clean"
energy security and confronting global climatetechnologies that offer an alternative, low carbon
change. And the best way to meet these goals ispath to the future. This watershed encompasses
for America to continue leading the way towardcosts, technology, maturity and scale of existing
the development of cleaner and moreenergy infrastructure.
energy-efficient technology".It is not enough to ask our new president to lead
Despite the president's more aggressiveus into a new role of energy leadership. With
statements on fighting climate change, his budgettoday's known conditions, there are two
request would reduce funding for energyimmediate future major hurdles that will have to
efficiency and renewable energy such as wind,be overcome to continue to a leadership role. The
solar, etc. The president gets much of thatfirst hurdle is the slowing of the US economy. We
reduction by slashing funding from $280 million tosuspect that the economy will slow and possibly
$60 million for low-income households togo into recession in late 2008 and 2009. This poor
"weatherize" their homes with new windows,economy could slow investments into renewable
better insulation and other efforts. As a frame ofenergies and postpone the momentum that the
reference, the Green Budget, which is used inUS currently has in adopting renewable energy.
Congress' budget deliberations, recommends aThe second hurdle is congress' failure to renew
FY2009 Weatherizating budget of $300 millionenergy-incentive tax credits that lapse at the end
dollars. On average, the Department of Energyof 2008. A new economic study by Navigant
has stated that weatherization reduces heatingConsulting finds that over 116,000 US jobs and
bills by 31 percent and overall energy bills by $358nearly $19 billion in US investments could be lost in
per year. The total 2009 request for Office ofjust one year if energy tax credits are not
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, a majorrenewed by Congress. It is a full agenda for a
Department of Energy agency, is $1.255 billion, anew President just to position the United States
27 percent cut from the 2008 level of $1.722to account for and reduce its own environmental
billion. The Green Budget recommendation for thepollution. To achieve a leadership role would be a
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewablegreat accomplishment and one that I hope that
Energy is $81 Billion Dollars. One would anticipatewe will witness.
major differences between the President's