North Korea Nuclear Talks Program Stalled

North Korea's nuclear weapons program remainsThe agreement was seen as a breakthrough. But
a key problem for the international community. InDan Pinkston, North Korea expert with the
this report from Washington, VOA SeniorMonterey Institute of International Studies, says
Correspondent André de Nesnera looks atthe accord was vague.
the North Korea question and discusses some of"The agreement was certainly open to
the options facing the world community.interpretation, depending on how you looked at it,"
The United States has been saying since Octoberhe explained. "It appeared to be very broad and
2002 that North Korea has a secret nuclearto include what everybody wanted and so it
weapons program. Since then, Pyongyang hasappeared to be a good agreement on the surface
pulled out of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty,that would make everyone better off. But of
expelled United Nations monitors, re-opened acourse, the details are open to interpretation."
nuclear facility it had promised to dismantle inAnalysts say in addition to being vague and being
1994 and announced that it has developed someopen to various interpretations, the accord had
nuclear devices.another drawback. David Arasé is an
Daryl Kimball heads the Arms Control Association,expert on North Korea with Pomona College.
an independent research organization. He says"The problem was that the timing of the
North Korea is manufacturing nuclear weapons,concessions was not made clear," said Mr.
though it is unclear how many warheads it mayArasé. "And so in November, when they
have.held another round of six-party talks to work on
"What North Korea has, right now, is the capabilitythose details of actual implementation of the
to continue to produce enough plutonium forprinciple, the talks fell apart, because the North
some six nuclear bombs a year," he explained.wanted a guarantee of a nuclear reactor to
"They have a large number of spent fuel rodsprovide electricity for the North before it would
already at a facility near a town called Yongbyongive up completely, verifiably, irreversibly, its
that provides enough material to extract aboutnuclear weapons. Technically, the issue is the
six bombs worth of plutonium a year. So thattiming of the implementation of the principle
work goes on right now. It is also possible, andsigned in September."
suspected by many, that North Korea has beenBut experts say other issues having little to do
seeking the capability to enrich uranium. It's notwith nuclear weapons have come up in the
clear how advanced that capability might be.six-party talks. Dan Pinkston from the Monterey
There is no known uranium enrichment facility. SoInstitute of International Studies, says the North
the main concern right now is that North KoreaKoreans have reacted negatively to those issues
has enough nuclear bomb material for some threebeing brought up.
to nine nuclear weapons and is separating"They are dissatisfied with the fact that the U.S. is
plutonium as we speak that could be used toapplying pressure in other areas, including naming a
make more."number of firms as having violated U.S.
For the past several years, the United States hasnon-proliferation laws," added Mr. Pinkston. "And
been trying to persuade North Korea to eliminatethey have been placed on a sanctions list. There
its nuclear weapons program. That effort haswas a bank in Macao that was blacklisted or had
been conducted through the negotiating forumits assets frozen by the U.S., which caused a run
known as the six-party talks, bringing togetheron the bank, for allegedly handling North Korean
the United States, China, Russia, Japan, Southtransfers, financial transfers related to the WMD
Korea and North Korea.[weapons of mass destruction] trade. So they are
After a 13-month hiatus, the six-party talksunhappy about that. There has been some
resumed last July. And Mr. Kimball says the partiesdiscussion about counterfeiting and other illegal
reached an agreement several months later,activities."
during another round of talks.North Korea has denied involvement in such
"In September, the six parties reached agreementactivities. But it has also decided to suspend its
on what is being referred to as a 'joint statementinvolvement in the six-party talks indefinitely
of principles,'" added Mr. Kimball. "It is more or lessbecause of the sanctions imposed on Pyongyang
a 'terms of reference' for further negotiations toby the United States.
resolve this crisis. And what the 'joint statementMr. Pinkston says the talks are at a standstill.
of principles' does, is it says that North Korea"All of the parties are dissatisfied," said Mr.
pledges to verifiably dismantle its nuclear weaponsPinkston. "Everyone is dissatisfied, but the
program. It also pledges the United States not torealization is that it could deteriorate and become
attack North Korea and it opens up the possibilitymuch worse and everyone wants to avoid that.
for the normalization of relations between theThat's why we are kind of sitting in this
United States and North Korea."stalemate.