The dangers of nuclear tests
 

Welcome to our nuclear testing Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

The Evolution of Project Management

Importance of Project Management is an 1970's other project management tools
important topic because all such as Material Requirements Planning
organisations, be they small or large, at (MRP) were also introduced.Examples of
one time or other, are involved in projects undertaken during this period
implementing new undertakings. These and which influenced the development of
undertakings may be diverse, such as, the modem project management as we know it
development of a new product or service; today include: (a)Polaris missile project
the establishment of a new production initiated in 1956 that had the objective
line in a manufacturing enterprise; a of delivering nuclear missiles carried by
public relations promotion campaign; or a submarines, known as Fleet Ballistic
major building programme. Whilst the Missile for the U.S Navy. The project
1980's were about quality and the 1990's successfully launched its first Polaris
were all about globalisation, the 2000's missile in 1961; (b) Apollo project
are about velocity. That is, to keep initiated in 1960 with the objective of
ahead of their competitors, organisations sending man to the moon; and (c) E.I du
are continually faced with the Pont de Nemours chemical plant project
development of complex products, services commencing in 1958, that had the
and processes with very short objective of building major chemical
time-to-market windows combined with the production plants across the U.S.[3]
need for cross-functional expertise. In 1980-1994: Production Centre Human
this scenario, project management becomes Resources. The 1980s and 1990's are
a very important and powerful tool in the characterised by the revolutionary
hands of organisations that understand development in the information management
its use and have the competencies to sector with the introduction of the
apply it.The development of project personal computer (PC) and associated
management capabilities in organisations, computer communications networking
simultaneously with the application of facilities. This development resulted in
information management systems, allow having low cost multitasking PCs that had
enterprise teams to work in partnership high efficiency in managing and
in defining plans and managing controlling complex project schedules.
take-to-market projects by synchronising During this period low cost project
team-oriented tasks, schedules, and management software for PCs became widely
resource allocations. This allows available that made project management
cross-functional teams to create and techniques more easily
share project information. However, this accessible.Examples of major projects
is not sufficient, information management undertaken during this period that
systems have the potential to allow illustrate the application of high
project management practices to take technology, and project management tools
place in a real-time environment. As a and practices include: (a) England France
consequence of this potential project Channel project, 1989 to1991. This
management proficiency, locally, project was an international project that
nationally or globally dispersed users involved two governments, several
are able to concurrently view and financial institutions, engineering
interact with the same updated project construction companies, and other various
information immediately, including organisations from the two countries. The
project schedules, threaded discussions, language, use of standard metrics, and
and other relevant documentation. In this other communication differences needed to
scenario the term dispersed user takes on be closely coordinated; (b) Space Shuttle
a wider meaning. It not only includes the Challenger project, 1983 to 1986. The
cross-functional management teams but disaster of the Challenger space shuttle
also experts drawn from the focused attention on risk management,
organisation's supply chain, and business group dynamics, and quality management;
partners.On a macro level organisations and (c) xv Calgary Winter Olympic of 1988
are motivated to implement project which successfully applied project
management techniques to ensure that management practices to event
their undertakings (small or major) are management.[4] 1995-Present: Creating a
delivered on time, within the cost budget New Environment. This period is dominated
and to the stipulated quality. On a micro by the developments related to the
level, project management combined internet that changed dramatically
with an appropriate information business practices in the mid 1990's. The
management system has the objectives of: internet has provided fast, interactive,
(a) reducing project overhead costs; (b) and customised new medium that allows
customising the project workplace to fit people to browse, purchase, and track
the operational style of the project products and services online instantly.
teams and respective team members; (c) This has resulted in making firms more
proactively informing the executive productive, more efficient, and more
management strata of the strategic client oriented. Furthermore, many of
projects on a real-time basis; (d) today's project management software have
ensuring that project team members share an internet connectivity feature. This
accurate, meaningful and timely project allows automatic uploading of data so
documents; and (e) ensuring that critical that anyone around the globe with a
task deadlines are met. Whilst the standard browser can: (a) input the most
motivation and objectives to apply recent status of their assigned tasks;
project management in organisations is (b) find out how the overall project is
commendable, they do not assure project doing; (c) be informed of any delays or
success.However, before discussing the advances in the schedule; and (d) stay
meaning and achievement of project "in the loop" for their project role,
success it is appropriate at this stage while working independently at a remote
to provide a brief history of project site.An example of a major project
management.Brief History of Project undertaken during this period is the Year
Management 2000 (Y2K) project. The Y2K Project,
Project management has been practiced known as the millennium bug referred to
for thousands of years dating back to the the problem that computers may not
Egyptian epoch, but it was in the function correctly on January lst, 2000
mid-1950's that organisations commenced at 12 AM. This was a global phenomenon
applying formal project management tools and was highly problematic because
and techniques to complex projects. resolving the problem at one's
Modern project management methods had organisation did not guarantee immunity,
their origins in two parallel but since a breakdown in the organisation's
different problems of planning and supply chain could affect the
control in projects in the United States. organisation's operating capability. Many
The first case involved the U.S Navy organisations set up a project office to
which at that time was concerned with the control and comply with their
control of contracts for its Polaris stakeholders regarding the Y2K issue.
Missile project. These contracts Furthermore, use of the Internet was
consisted of research, development work common practice that led to the
and manufacturing of parts that were establishment of the virtual project
unique and had never been previously office. The goal of this virtual project
undertaken.This particular project was office was: (a) to deliver uninterrupted
characterised by high uncertainty, since turn-of-the-century; (b) monitor Y2K
neither cost nor time could be accurately project efforts; (c) provide
estimated. Hence, completion times were coordination; (d) develop a risk
based on probabilities. Time estimates management plan; and (e) communicate Y2K
were based on optimistic, pessimistic and compliance efforts with various
most likely. These three time scenarios stakeholders. Thus, the virtual project
were mathematically assessed to determine office was a focal point for all the
the probable completion date. This project works, and it increased the
procedure was called program evaluation awareness and importance of risk
review technique (PERT). Initially, the management practices to numerous
PERT technique did not take into organisations.Why Project
consideration cost. However, the cost Management?There is no doubt that
feature was later included using the same organisations today face more aggressive
estimating approach as with time. Due to competition than in the past and the
the three estimation scenarios, PERT was business environment they operate in is a
found (and still is) to be best suited highly turbulent one. This scenario has
for projects with a high degree of increased the need for organisational
uncertainty reflecting their level of accountability for the private and public
uniqueness. The second case, involved the sectors, leading to a greater focus and
private sector, namely, E.I du Pont de demand for operational effectiveness and
Nemours Company, which had undertaken to efficiency.Effectiveness and efficiency
construct major chemical plants in U.S. may be facilitated through the
Unlike the Navy Polaris project, these introduction of best practices that are
construction undertakings required able to optimise the management of
accurate time and cost estimates. The organisational resources. It has been
methodology developed by this company was shown that operations and projects are
originally referred to as project dissimilar with each requiring different
planning and scheduling (PPS). PPS management techniques. Hence, in a
required realistic estimates of cost and project environment, project management
time, and is thus a more definitive can: (a) support the achievement of
approach than PERT. The PPS technique was project and organisational goals; and (b)
later developed into the critical path provide a greater assurance to
method (CPM) that became very popular stakeholders that resources are being
with the construction industry. During managed effectively.Research by Roberts
the 1960s and 1970s, both PERT and CPM and Furlonger [2] in a study of
increased their popularity within the information systems projects show that
private and public sectors. Defence using a reasonably detailed project
Departments of various countries, NASA, management methodology, as compared to a
and large engineering and construction loose methodology, improves productivity
companies world wide applied project by 20 to 30 percent. Furthermore, the use
management principles and tools to manage of a formalised project management
large budget, schedule-driven projects. structure to projects can facilitate: (a)
The popularity in the use of these the clarification of project scope; (b)
project management tools during this agreement of objectives and goals; (c)
period coincided with the development of identifying resources needed; (d)
computers and the associated packages ensuring accountability for results and
that specialised in project management. performance; (e) and encouraging the
However, initially these computer project team to focus on the final
packages were very costly and were benefits to be achieved. Moreover, the
executed only on mainframe or mini research indicates that 85-90% of
computers. The use of project management projects fail to deliver on time, on
techniques in the 1980s was facilitated budget and to the quality of performance
with the advent of the personal computer expected. The major causes identified for
and associated low cost project this situation include:
management software. Hence, during this (a) Lack of a valid business case
period, the manufacturing and software justifying the project;
development sectors commenced to adopt (b) Objectives not properly defined and
and implement sophisticated project agreed;
management practices as well. By the (c) Lack of communication and
1990s, project management theories, stakeholder management;
tools, and techniques were widely (d) Outcomes and/or benefits not
received by different industries and properly defined in measurable terms;
organisations.Four periods in the (e) Lack of quality control;
development of modern project (f) Poor estimation of duration and
management.[1] Prior to 1958: Craft cost;
system to human relations. During this (g) Inadequate definition and acceptance
time, the evolution of technology, such of roles (governance);
as, automobiles and telecommunications (h) Insufficient planning and
shortened the project schedule. For coordination of resources.It should be
instance, automobiles allowed effective emphasised that the causes for the
resource allocation and mobility, whilst failure to deliver on time, on budget and
the telecommunication system increased to the quality of performance expected
the speed of communication. Furthermore, could be addressed by the application of
the job specification which later became project management practices.
the basis of developing the Work Furthermore, the failure to deliver on
Breakdown Structure (WBS) was widely used time, on budget and to the quality of
and Henry Gantt invented the Gantt chart. performance expected does not necessarily
Examples of projects undertaken during mean that the project was itself a
this period as supported by documented failure. At this stage what is being
evidence include: (a) Building the discussed is the effectiveness and
Pacific Railroad in 1850's; (b) efficiency of project execution and not
Construction of the Hoover Dam in whether a project is a success or
1931-1936, that employed approximately failure.Conclusion
5,200 workers and is still one of the Project management should be viewed as a
highest gravity dams in the U.S. tool that helps organisations to execute
generating about four billion kilowatt designated projects effectively and
hours a year; and (c) The Manhattan efficiently. The use of this tool does
Project in 1942-1945 that was the pioneer not automatically guarantee project
research and development project for success. (project success will be
producing the atomic bomb, involving discussed in a subsequent issue).
125,000 workers and costing nearly $2 However, in preparation for the next
billion.[2] 1958-1979: Application of issue, I would like you to think about
Management Science. Significant the distinction between project success
technology advancement took place between and project management success. This
1958 and 1979, such as, the first distinction will provide further insight
automatic plain-paper copier by Xerox in to the questions: Why are some projects
1959. Between 1956 and 1958 several core perceived as failures when they have met
project management tools including CPM all the traditional standards of success,
and PERT were introduced. However, this namely, completed on time, completed
period was characterised by the rapid within budget, and meeting all the
development of computer technology. The technical specifications? Why are some
progression from the mainframe to the projects perceived to be successful when
mini-computer in the 1970's made they have failed to meet two important
computers affordable to medium size criteria that are traditionally
companies. In 1975, Bill Gates and Paul associated with success, namely, not
Allen founded Microsoft. Furthermore, the completed on time and not completed
evolution of computer technology within budget?Sandro Azzopardi is a
facilitated the emergence of several professional author who writes several
project management software companies, articles on various subjects on his web
including, Artemis (1977), Oracle (1977), site and local newspapers and magazines.
and Scitor Corporation (1979). In the




www.studycommittee.org keyword stats [2007-06-10-2007-06-10]



Daily top traffic source : Google
Most current Google search phrases:

nuclear bomb high altitude nuclear testing cons

Other search phrases:

nuclear quality assurance korea second nuclear test
nuclear waste united states ouija board dangers
north korea claims nuclear test dual isotope nuclear stress test
cold war nuclear bombs north korea tested nuclear
redstone nuclear test hawaii emp largest non nuclear bomb
north korea nuclear test october 9 how nuclear power plants work
consequences of nuclear warfare nuclear bomb attack
nuclear testing korea ocean nuclear
nuclear bomb detonation nuclear energy pro and cons
nuclear power plant electricity kim jong il testing nuclear weapons
nuclear bomb history pakistan nuclear testing
cook nuclear power plant dangers plastic surgery
the risk of nuclear terrorism





1- A- B- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43-