The Evolution of Project Management

Importance of Project Management is an(1977), and Scitor Corporation (1979). In the
important topic because all organisations, be they1970's other project management tools such as
small or large, at one time or other, are involvedMaterial Requirements Planning (MRP) were also
in implementing new undertakings. Theseintroduced.Examples of projects undertaken during
undertakings may be diverse, such as, thethis period and which influenced the development
development of a new product or service; theof modem project management as we know it
establishment of a new production line in atoday include: (a)Polaris missile project initiated in
manufacturing enterprise; a public relations1956 that had the objective of delivering nuclear
promotion campaign; or a major buildingmissiles carried by submarines, known as Fleet
programme. Whilst the 1980's were about qualityBallistic Missile for the U.S Navy. The project
and the 1990's were all about globalisation, thesuccessfully launched its first Polaris missile in 1961;
2000's are about velocity. That is, to keep ahead(b) Apollo project initiated in 1960 with the
of their competitors, organisations are continuallyobjective of sending man to the moon; and (c) E.I
faced with the development of complex products,du Pont de Nemours chemical plant project
services and processes with very shortcommencing in 1958, that had the objective of
time-to-market windows combined with the needbuilding major chemical production plants across
for cross-functional expertise. In this scenario,the U.S.[3] 1980-1994: Production Centre Human
project management becomes a very importantResources. The 1980s and 1990's are
and powerful tool in the hands of organisationscharacterised by the revolutionary development in
that understand its use and have thethe information management sector with the
competencies to apply it.The development ofintroduction of the personal computer (PC) and
project management capabilities in organisations,associated computer communications networking
simultaneously with the application of informationfacilities. This development resulted in having low
management systems, allow enterprise teams tocost multitasking PCs that had high efficiency in
work in partnership in defining plans and managingmanaging and controlling complex project
take-to-market projects by synchronisingschedules. During this period low cost project
team-oriented tasks, schedules, and resourcemanagement software for PCs became widely
allocations. This allows cross-functional teams toavailable that made project management
create and share project information. However,techniques more easily accessible.Examples of
this is not sufficient, information managementmajor projects undertaken during this period that
systems have the potential to allow projectillustrate the application of high technology, and
management practices to take place in a real-timeproject management tools and practices include:
environment. As a consequence of this potential(a) England France Channel project, 1989 to1991.
project management proficiency, locally, nationallyThis project was an international project that
or globally dispersed users are able toinvolved two governments, several financial
concurrently view and interact with the sameinstitutions, engineering construction companies,
updated project information immediately, includingand other various organisations from the two
project schedules, threaded discussions, and othercountries. The language, use of standard metrics,
relevant documentation. In this scenario the termand other communication differences needed to
dispersed user takes on a wider meaning. It notbe closely coordinated; (b) Space Shuttle
only includes the cross-functional managementChallenger project, 1983 to 1986. The disaster of
teams but also experts drawn from thethe Challenger space shuttle focused attention on
organisation's supply chain, and businessrisk management, group dynamics, and quality
partners.On a macro level organisations aremanagement; and (c) xv Calgary Winter Olympic
motivated to implement project managementof 1988 which successfully applied project
techniques to ensure that their undertakings (smallmanagement practices to event management.[4]
or major) are delivered on time, within the cost1995-Present: Creating a New Environment. This
budget and to the stipulated quality. On a microperiod is dominated by the developments related
level, project management combinedto the internet that changed dramatically business
with an appropriate information managementpractices in the mid 1990's. The internet has
system has the objectives of: (a) reducingprovided fast, interactive, and customised new
project overhead costs; (b) customising themedium that allows people to browse, purchase,
project workplace to fit the operational style ofand track products and services online instantly.
the project teams and respective teamThis has resulted in making firms more
members; (c) proactively informing the executiveproductive, more efficient, and more client
management strata of the strategic projects onoriented. Furthermore, many of today's project
a real-time basis; (d) ensuring that project teammanagement software have an internet
members share accurate, meaningful and timelyconnectivity feature. This allows automatic
project documents; and (e) ensuring that criticaluploading of data so that anyone around the globe
task deadlines are met. Whilst the motivation andwith a standard browser can: (a) input the most
objectives to apply project management inrecent status of their assigned tasks; (b) find out
organisations is commendable, they do not assurehow the overall project is doing; (c) be informed
project success.However, before discussing theof any delays or advances in the schedule; and
meaning and achievement of project success it is(d) stay "in the loop" for their project role, while
appropriate at this stage to provide a brief historyworking independently at a remote site.An
of project management.Brief History of Projectexample of a major project undertaken during
Managementthis period is the Year 2000 (Y2K) project. The
Project management has been practiced forY2K Project, known as the millennium bug
thousands of years dating back to the Egyptianreferred to the problem that computers may not
epoch, but it was in the mid-1950's thatfunction correctly on January lst, 2000 at 12 AM.
organisations commenced applying formal projectThis was a global phenomenon and was highly
management tools and techniques to complexproblematic because resolving the problem at
projects. Modern project management methodsone's organisation did not guarantee immunity,
had their origins in two parallel but differentsince a breakdown in the organisation's supply
problems of planning and control in projects in thechain could affect the organisation's operating
United States. The first case involved the U.Scapability. Many organisations set up a project
Navy which at that time was concerned with theoffice to control and comply with their
control of contracts for its Polaris Missile project.stakeholders regarding the Y2K issue.
These contracts consisted of research,Furthermore, use of the Internet was common
development work and manufacturing of partspractice that led to the establishment of the
that were unique and had never been previouslyvirtual project office. The goal of this virtual
undertaken.This particular project wasproject office was: (a) to deliver uninterrupted
characterised by high uncertainty, since neitherturn-of-the-century; (b) monitor Y2K project
cost nor time could be accurately estimated.efforts; (c) provide coordination; (d) develop a risk
Hence, completion times were based onmanagement plan; and (e) communicate Y2K
probabilities. Time estimates were based oncompliance efforts with various stakeholders.
optimistic, pessimistic and most likely. These threeThus, the virtual project office was a focal point
time scenarios were mathematically assessed tofor all the project works, and it increased the
determine the probable completion date. Thisawareness and importance of risk management
procedure was called program evaluation reviewpractices to numerous organisations.Why Project
technique (PERT). Initially, the PERT technique didManagement?There is no doubt that organisations
not take into consideration cost. However, thetoday face more aggressive competition than in
cost feature was later included using the samethe past and the business environment they
estimating approach as with time. Due to theoperate in is a highly turbulent one. This scenario
three estimation scenarios, PERT was found (andhas increased the need for organisational
still is) to be best suited for projects with a highaccountability for the private and public sectors,
degree of uncertainty reflecting their level ofleading to a greater focus and demand for
uniqueness. The second case, involved the privateoperational effectiveness and
sector, namely, E.I du Pont de Nemoursefficiency.Effectiveness and efficiency may be
Company, which had undertaken to constructfacilitated through the introduction of best
major chemical plants in U.S. Unlike the Navypractices that are able to optimise the
Polaris project, these construction undertakingsmanagement of organisational resources. It has
required accurate time and cost estimates. Thebeen shown that operations and projects are
methodology developed by this company wasdissimilar with each requiring different
originally referred to as project planning andmanagement techniques. Hence, in a project
scheduling (PPS). PPS required realistic estimatesenvironment, project management can: (a)
of cost and time, and is thus a more definitivesupport the achievement of project and
approach than PERT. The PPS technique was laterorganisational goals; and (b) provide a greater
developed into the critical path method (CPM) thatassurance to stakeholders that resources are
became very popular with the constructionbeing managed effectively.Research by Roberts
industry. During the 1960s and 1970s, both PERTand Furlonger [2] in a study of information
and CPM increased their popularity within thesystems projects show that using a reasonably
private and public sectors. Defence Departmentsdetailed project management methodology, as
of various countries, NASA, and large engineeringcompared to a loose methodology, improves
and construction companies world wide appliedproductivity by 20 to 30 percent. Furthermore,
project management principles and tools tothe use of a formalised project management
manage large budget, schedule-driven projects.structure to projects can facilitate: (a) the
The popularity in the use of these projectclarification of project scope; (b) agreement of
management tools during this period coincidedobjectives and goals; (c) identifying resources
with the development of computers and theneeded; (d) ensuring accountability for results and
associated packages that specialised in projectperformance; (e) and encouraging the project
management. However, initially these computerteam to focus on the final benefits to be
packages were very costly and were executedachieved. Moreover, the research indicates that
only on mainframe or mini computers. The use of85-90% of projects fail to deliver on time, on
project management techniques in the 1980s wasbudget and to the quality of performance
facilitated with the advent of the personalexpected. The major causes identified for this
computer and associated low cost projectsituation include:
management software. Hence, during this period,(a) Lack of a valid business case justifying the
the manufacturing and software developmentproject;
sectors commenced to adopt and implement(b) Objectives not properly defined and agreed;
sophisticated project management practices as(c) Lack of communication and stakeholder
well. By the 1990s, project management theories,management;
tools, and techniques were widely received by(d) Outcomes and/or benefits not properly
different industries and organisations.Four periodsdefined in measurable terms;
in the development of modern project(e) Lack of quality control;
management.[1] Prior to 1958: Craft system to(f) Poor estimation of duration and cost;
human relations. During this time, the evolution of(g) Inadequate definition and acceptance of roles
technology, such as, automobiles and(governance);
telecommunications shortened the project(h) Insufficient planning and coordination of
schedule. For instance, automobiles allowedresources.It should be emphasised that the
effective resource allocation and mobility, whilstcauses for the failure to deliver on time, on
the telecommunication system increased thebudget and to the quality of performance
speed of communication. Furthermore, the jobexpected could be addressed by the application of
specification which later became the basis ofproject management practices. Furthermore, the
developing the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)failure to deliver on time, on budget and to the
was widely used and Henry Gantt invented thequality of performance expected does not
Gantt chart. Examples of projects undertakennecessarily mean that the project was itself a
during this period as supported by documentedfailure. At this stage what is being discussed is the
evidence include: (a) Building the Pacific Railroad ineffectiveness and efficiency of project execution
1850's; (b) Construction of the Hoover Dam inand not whether a project is a success or
1931-1936, that employed approximately 5,200failure.Conclusion
workers and is still one of the highest gravityProject management should be viewed as a tool
dams in the U.S. generating about four billionthat helps organisations to execute designated
kilowatt hours a year; and (c) The Manhattanprojects effectively and efficiently. The use of
Project in 1942-1945 that was the pioneerthis tool does not automatically guarantee project
research and development project for producingsuccess. (project success will be discussed in a
the atomic bomb, involving 125,000 workers andsubsequent issue). However, in preparation for the
costing nearly $2 billion.[2] 1958-1979: Applicationnext issue, I would like you to think about the
of Management Science. Significant technologydistinction between project success and project
advancement took place between 1958 and 1979,management success. This distinction will provide
such as, the first automatic plain-paper copier byfurther insight to the questions: Why are some
Xerox in 1959. Between 1956 and 1958 severalprojects perceived as failures when they have
core project management tools including CPM andmet all the traditional standards of success,
PERT were introduced. However, this period wasnamely, completed on time, completed within
characterised by the rapid development ofbudget, and meeting all the technical
computer technology. The progression from thespecifications? Why are some projects perceived
mainframe to the mini-computer in the 1970'sto be successful when they have failed to meet
made computers affordable to medium sizetwo important criteria that are traditionally
companies. In 1975, Bill Gates and Paul Allenassociated with success, namely, not completed
founded Microsoft. Furthermore, the evolution ofon time and not completed within budget?Sandro
computer technology facilitated the emergence ofAzzopardi is a professional author who writes
several project management softwareseveral articles on various subjects on his web
companies, including, Artemis (1977), Oraclesite and local newspapers and magazines.