The dangers of nuclear tests
 

Welcome to our nuclear testing Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

Article #81: Just War

(Browse for more articles)

 
In an age of terrorism, guerilla and according to the United Nations Charter,
total warfare the medieval doctrine of exclusively, self-defense);
Just War needs to be re-defined. Being (formally) declared by a proper
Moreover, issues of legitimacy, efficacy authority;
and morality should not be confused. Possessing a right intention;
Legitimacy is conferred by institutions. Having a reasonable chance of success;
Not all morally justified wars are, The end being proportional to the means
therefore, automatically legitimate. used."
Frequently the efficient execution of a Yet, the evolution of warfare - the
battle plan involves immoral or even invention of nuclear weapons, the
illegal acts. propagation of total war, the ubiquity of
As international law evolves beyond the guerrilla and national liberation
ancient percepts of sovereignty, it movements, the emergence of global,
should incorporate new thinking about border-hopping terrorist organizations,
pre-emptive strikes, human rights of totalitarian regimes, and rogue or
violations as casus belli and the role failed states - requires these principles
and standing of international to be modified by adding these tenets:
organizations, insurgents and liberation That the declaring authority is a
movements. lawfully and democratically elected
Yet, inevitably, what constitutes government.
"justice" depends heavily on the cultural That the declaration of war reflects the
and societal contexts, narratives, mores, popular will.
and values of the disputants. Thus, one (Extension of 3) The right intention is
cannot answer the deceivingly simple to act in just cause.
question: "Is this war a just war?" - (Extension of 4) ... or a reasonable
without first asking: "According to whom? chance of avoiding an annihilating
In which context? By which criteria? defeat.
Based on what values? In which period in (Extension of 5) That the outcomes of war
history and where?" are preferable to the outcomes of the
Being members of Western Civilization, preservation of peace.
whether by choice or by default, our Still, the doctrine of just war,
understanding of what constitutes a just conceived in Europe in eras past, is
war is crucially founded on our shifting fraying at the edges. Rights and
perceptions of the West. corresponding duties are ill-defined or
Imagine a village of 220 inhabitants. It mismatched. What is legal is not always
has one heavily armed police constable moral and what is legitimate is not
flanked by two lightly equipped invariably legal. Political realism and
assistants. The hamlet is beset by a quasi-religious idealism sit
bunch of ruffians who molest their own uncomfortably within the same conceptual
families and, at times, violently lash framework. Norms are vague and debatable
out at their neighbors. These delinquents while customary law is only partially
mock the authorities and ignore their subsumed in the tradition (i.e., in
decisions and decrees. treaties, conventions and other
Yet, the village council - the source of instruments, as well in the actual
legitimacy - refuses to authorize the conduct of states).
constable to apprehend the villains and The most contentious issue is, of course,
dispose of them, by force of arms if need what constitutes "just cause".
be. The elders see no imminent or present Self-defense, in its narrowest sense
danger to their charges and are afraid of (reaction to direct and overwhelming
potential escalation whose evil outcomes armed aggression), is a justified casus
could far outweigh anything the felons belli. But what about the use of force to
can achieve. (deontologically, consequentially, or
Incensed by this laxity, the constable - ethically):
backed only by some of the inhabitants - Prevent or ameliorate a slow-motion or
breaks into the home of one of the more permanent humanitarian crisis;
egregious thugs and expels or kills him. Preempt a clear and present danger of
He claims to have acted preemptively and aggression ("anticipatory or preemptive
in self-defense, as the criminal, long in self-defense" against what Grotius called
defiance of the law, was planning to "immediate danger");
attack its representatives. Secure a safe environment for urgent and
Was the constable right in acting the way indispensable humanitarian relief
he did? operations;
On the one hand, he may have saved lives Restore democracy in the attacked state
and prevented a conflagration whose ("regime change");
consequences no one could predict. On the Restore public order in the attacked
other hand, by ignoring the edicts of the state;
village council and the expressed will of Prevent human rights violations or crimes
many of the denizens, he has placed against humanity or violations of
himself above the law, as its absolute international law by the attacked state;
interpreter and enforcer. Keep the peace ("peacekeeping
What is the greater danger? Turning a operations") and enforce compliance with
blind eye to the exploits of outlaws and international or bilateral treaties
outcasts, thus rendering them ever more between the aggressor and the attacked
daring and insolent - or acting state or the attacked state and a third
unilaterally to counter such pariahs, party;
thus undermining the communal legal Suppress armed infiltration, indirect
foundation and, possibly, leading to a aggression, or civil strife aided and
chaotic situation of "might is right"? In abetted by the attacked state;
other words, when ethics and expedience Honor one's obligations to frameworks and
conflict with legality - which should treaties of collective self-defense;
prevail? Protect one's citizens or the citizens of
Enter the medieval doctrine of "Just War" a third party inside the attacked state;
(justum bellum, or, more precisely jus ad Protect one's property or assets owned by
bellum), propounded by Saint Augustine of a third party inside the attacked state;
Hippo (fifth century AD), Saint Thomas Respond to an invitation by the
Aquinas (1225-1274) in his "Summa authorities of the attacked state - and
Theologicae", Francisco de Vitoria with their expressed consent - to
(1548-1617), Francisco Suarez militarily intervene within the territory
(1548-1617), Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) in of the attacked state;
his influential tome "Jure Belli ac React to offenses against the nation's
Pacis" ("On Rights of War and Peace", honor or its economy.
1625), Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1704), Unless these issues are resolved and
Christian Wolff (1679-1754), and Emerich codified, the entire edifice of
de Vattel (1714-1767). international law - and, more
Modern thinkers include Michael Walzer in specifically, the law of war - is in
"Just and Unjust Wars" (1977), Barrie danger of crumbling. The contemporary
Paskins and Michael Dockrill in "The multilateral regime proved inadequate and
Ethics of War" (1979), Richard Norman in unable to effectively tackle genocide
"Ethics, Killing, and War" (1995), Thomas (Rwanda, Bosnia), terror (in Africa,
Nagel in "War and Massacre", and Central Asia, and the Middle East),
Elizabeth Anscombe in "War and Murder". weapons of mass destruction (Iraq, India,
According to the Catholic Church's Israel, Pakistan, North Korea), and
rendition of this theory, set forth by tyranny (in dozens of members of the
Bishop Wilton D. Gregory of the United United Nations).
States Conference of Catholic Bishops in This feebleness inevitably led to the
his Letter to President Bush on Iraq, resurgence of "might is right"
dated September 13, 2002, going to war is unilateralism, as practiced, for
justified if these conditions are met: instance, by the United States in places
"The damage inflicted by the aggressor on as diverse as Grenada and Iraq. This
the nation or community of nations [is] pernicious and ominous phenomenon is
lasting, grave, and certain; all other coupled with contempt towards and
means of putting an end to it must have suspicion of international organizations,
been shown to be impractical or treaties, institutions, undertakings, and
ineffective; there must be serious the prevailing consensual order.
prospects of success; the use of arms In a unipolar world, reliant on a single
must not produce evils and disorders superpower for its security, the
graver than the evil to be eliminated." abrogation of the rules of the game could
A just war is, therefore, a last resort, lead to chaotic and lethal anarchy with a
all other peaceful conflict resolution multitude of "rebellions" against the
options having been exhausted. emergent American Empire. International
The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy law - the formalism of "natural law" - is
sums up the doctrine thus: only one of many competing universalist
"The principles of the justice of war are and missionary value systems. Militant
commonly held to be: Islam is another. The West must adopt the
Having just cause (especially and, former to counter the latter.






1- A- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49- 50- 51- 52- 53- 54-