| The question used to be, "Can evolution
| |
| | passed on to future generations better
|
| be proven?" Today, a more appropriate
| |
| | biceps, for example, as a result of
|
| question is, "Is evolution science?"(The
| |
| | radiotherapy. Not one of the thousands
|
| following is a condensed version of the
| |
| | of surviving bomb victims of Hiroshima
|
| chapter entitled "Genetics" of the book
| |
| | and Nagasaki has developed a more evolved
|
| "Evolution: A Science Breakdown,"
| |
| | brain, for example, as a result of
|
| available free at )To most people,
| |
| | exposure to radioactivity. Not one
|
| science is seen as "today," modern,
| |
| | person involved in a nuclear reactor
|
| up-to- date, and perhaps even the promise
| |
| | accident has developed a more
|
| of futuristic wonders. A generation
| |
| | sophisticated skin, for instance, which
|
| which possesses supersonic jets,
| |
| | is tougher and more durable than average.
|
| Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
| |
| | In virtually every case, random
|
| (ICBM's), space shuttles and
| |
| | mutations have resulted in havoc and
|
| sophisticated computers can hardly be
| |
| | destruction.Is it possible that modern
|
| called primitive. Or can it?In the midst
| |
| | technology has actually disproven
|
| of all of this state-of-the-art
| |
| | evolution rather than helped
|
| technology, there seems to be a rather
| |
| | it?Evolutionists in the past have hidden
|
| primitive theory which, although steadily
| |
| | behind the "it took billions of years"
|
| losing credibility even among those who
| |
| | routine. Before the nuclear age it may
|
| have adhered to it for a long time, still
| |
| | have been necessary to get into a time
|
| has many convinced that it is based on
| |
| | machine to verify whether, given enough
|
| science. This theory has proven one
| |
| | time, random mutations would cause life
|
| thing beyond a shadow of a doubt:
| |
| | to evolve. However, with the advent of
|
| although modern technology is nearing
| |
| | modern technology's ability to affect
|
| Star Wars sophistication, modern man is
| |
| | massive random mutations relatively
|
| still capable of some embarrassingly
| |
| | quickly, there is no longer a need to dig
|
| primitive thinking. I'm talking about
| |
| | into the past to see the contrived
|
| the "scientific" theory of evolution. If
| |
| | fallacies supporting the evolutionary
|
| this theory is not honest
| |
| | powers of random mutation. The answer is
|
| misinterpretation, it may very well be
| |
| | right in front of us. Random mutations
|
| the most sophisticated hoax ever
| |
| | result in quite the opposite of what
|
| perpetrated on the human race.The
| |
| | we've been led to believe. They result
|
| scientific concept of the origin of life
| |
| | in nothing but illness and
|
| on earth begins with the premise that
| |
| | fatalities--not improvements. What's
|
| life first appeared billions of years ago
| |
| | more, the more massive and prolonged the
|
| with the formation of microscopic
| |
| | occurrences of these mutations, the
|
| organisms out of inanimate matter. In
| |
| | greater the havoc and destruction. So
|
| the billions of years which followed,
| |
| | what do you suppose would happen to a
|
| small organisms evolved into higher and
| |
| | planet subjected to random mutations for
|
| more complex forms of life, and one
| |
| | billions of years? Total
|
| species evolved into another.The question
| |
| | annihilation!When you take what we know
|
| here is not whether this actually
| |
| | as fact today about random mutation and
|
| happened. To any human being living in
| |
| | try to reconstruct a scenario of those
|
| the 1990's, the question should be, is
| |
| | alleged billions of years of earth's
|
| such a scenario even possible? Well,
| |
| | history, instead of the fairy-tale story
|
| according to what we know today about
| |
| | of evolution, you come up with a picture
|
| genetics, the answer is an unequivocal
| |
| | which more and more resembles a horrible
|
| no.Probably the strongest thing going for
| |
| | scene out of a "post-nuke" movie:Even if
|
| evolution at the time of its inception,
| |
| | earth had already been as populated in
|
| over a hundred years ago, was that
| |
| | that alleged period of three and a half
|
| virtually nothing was known about
| |
| | billion years ago as it is today, and had
|
| genetics in that era. I am convinced
| |
| | since been affected by billions and
|
| that if the public had had a decent
| |
| | billions of random mutations, according
|
| understanding of genetics, and random
| |
| | to what we know today about random
|
| mutation in particular, before being
| |
| | mutation, by now life would probably have
|
| presented with the theory of evolution,
| |
| | been virtually wiped out. With random
|
| the theory could never have been taken
| |
| | mutation being the highly destructive
|
| seriously and certainly could never have
| |
| | force that it apparently is, the process
|
| been accepted as legitimate
| |
| | which was supposed to have caused life to
|
| science.According to evolutionists,
| |
| | evolve is precisely what would have
|
| random mutation is purportedly what
| |
| | caused, in all probability, such genetic
|
| brought life from the one celled stage to
| |
| | havoc that few organisms would have
|
| its present complexity. That is, through
| |
| | survived the ordeal. Furthermore, under
|
| a series of beneficial accidents of
| |
| | such circumstances, "survival of the
|
| random mutations, they claim, simple
| |
| | fittest" is a totally ludicrous concept.
|
| organisms evolved over billions of years
| |
| | The word "fit" would have described
|
| into new and more complex species.Keep in
| |
| | largely those organisms which were less
|
| mind that for one species to have evolved
| |
| | disease ridden than the rest, a far cry
|
| into another, massive random genetic
| |
| | from the "better species" of evolution.
|
| changes would have to have occurred
| |
| | And of those "fit" survivors, many would
|
| throughout earth's history. But here's
| |
| | have passed on genetic diseases to their
|
| how genetics--the most crucial aspect of
| |
| | offspring. Even if the "fit" had not
|
| evolution--does not only not support the
| |
| | been wiped out by the random mutations,
|
| theory but actually contradicts it:Modern
| |
| | their offspring still would have stood a
|
| man has been acquainted with and acutely
| |
| | chance of being wiped out by hereditary
|
| affected by random mutations more than
| |
| | genetic diseases. Then, any disease-free
|
| any prehistoric creature. Sources of
| |
| | offspring would again be threatened with
|
| random mutations have been around us for
| |
| | annihilation when this entire mutation
|
| years. What are they? Carcinogenic
| |
| | cycle started over again.Thus, after
|
| chemicals. Cosmic rays. Sources of
| |
| | billions and billions of years of random
|
| radioactivity such as nuclear weapons,
| |
| | mutations, even in the unlikely event
|
| nuclear reactors, nuclear waste, and
| |
| | that some genes mutated in a way that
|
| medical X-rays. And some of these
| |
| | might have ultimately produced some
|
| sources of random mutations have been
| |
| | beneficial changes to an organism, an
|
| affecting modern man way before he even
| |
| | already populated planet would have been
|
| knew how they wreaked their havoc.Let's
| |
| | reduced to a few diseased life forms, at
|
| take radiation, for example. Here's an
| |
| | best. Those few beneficial genes, if
|
| idea of what it does:
| |
| | they could even have existed, would have
|
| Exposure of high doses of radiation to
| |
| | been so overwhelmed by the staggeringly
|
| limited parts of the body can cause
| |
| | high number of diseased genes necessary
|
| severe tissue damage and eventual
| |
| | to produce just a few beneficial
|
| necrosis.Exposure of the entire body to a
| |
| | accidents, that they could never have
|
| few hundred "rem" (rem is a unit used for
| |
| | borne any fruit. An organism would have
|
| measuring radiation effectiveness) can
| |
| | been wiped out long before it had an iota
|
| initially cause nausea. Then, in about a
| |
| | of a chance to change or improve. In a
|
| month, the person might begin suffering
| |
| | sense, earth would have resembled a
|
| hemorrhages, anemia, tiredness, weakness,
| |
| | planet after a nuclear holocaust.Now, if
|
| and an increased risk of infection.
| |
| | a planet began with relatively few life
|
| Although some may survive, others will
| |
| | forms, as earth allegedly did, how far
|
| die as a result of these maladies.At
| |
| | would life have gotten? I don't mean how
|
| about 1,000 rem, nausea, vomiting, and
| |
| | far would evolution have gotten. I mean,
|
| diarrhea may develop within hours of
| |
| | how far would those few organisms have
|
| exposure. As these symptoms become
| |
| | gotten before being wiped out by the
|
| worse, they are followed by fever, loss
| |
| | destructive powers of random mutation?
|
| of fluids, severe infections, and finally
| |
| | According to what we've actually seen
|
| death.At about 10,000 rem, the dose to
| |
| | random mutations do in modern times, life
|
| which a worker might be exposed during a
| |
| | never would have gotten off the ground,
|
| nuclear reactor accident, vomiting and
| |
| | let alone proliferated into highly
|
| diarrhea would occur within an hour,
| |
| | complex and healthy species. In all
|
| followed by reduced blood pressure,
| |
| | likelihood, earth would have turned into
|
| convulsions, and unconsciousness. Death
| |
| | a desolate planet long ago.The insanity
|
| would come within one to three
| |
| | of evolution is also apparent in the more
|
| days.Radiation can also have long-term
| |
| | aesthetic aspects of man. How could
|
| genetic effects. Studies show that
| |
| | qualities such as artistry, abstract
|
| radiation can cause not just one, but a
| |
| | thinking, and appreciation of music have
|
| variety of different types of mutations.
| |
| | become traits common to an entire
|
| One of the effects of these
| |
| | species? According to the mechanics (or
|
| aberrations is cancer. The cancer can
| |
| | imagery) of evolution, it would have been
|
| show up years or even decades after the
| |
| | a great wonder if such qualities, so
|
| organism's exposure to radiation. If the
| |
| | meaningless to the survival of purely
|
| organism does not show any signs of
| |
| | physical and biological systems, would
|
| cancer, there is still the
| |
| | have evolved in only a minute fraction of
|
| possibility that cancer may show up in
| |
| | a species. Yet, to be present--to one
|
| future generations.Some other disorders
| |
| | degree or another--in virtually every
|
| or genetic diseases which may show up in
| |
| | human being? How? This should never
|
| later generations as a result of random
| |
| | have happened.The existence of such
|
| mutations are: hemophilia, congenital
| |
| | aesthetic human qualities as emotion,
|
| cataract, spontaneous abortions, cystic
| |
| | humor, and intellect cannot be explained
|
| fibrosis, color-blindness, and muscular
| |
| | biologically, no matter how ridiculous
|
| dystrophy.Still other diseases such as
| |
| | you want to get. Why, for example, did
|
| diabetes, heart disorders, asthma, and
| |
| | nature give us a sense of humor? How did
|
| schizophrenia could manifest themselves
| |
| | nature even know what a sense of humor
|
| in later generations as a result of
| |
| | was? And how did a sense of humor render
|
| random mutations combined with
| |
| | humans more "fit to survive?" There are
|
| environmental factors.This was just a
| |
| | millions of plants and animals without a
|
| quick glimpse of the severe effects of
| |
| | sense of humor which have obviously
|
| random changes on biological life. And
| |
| | survived. There are even humans without
|
| it seems that the results are almost
| |
| | a sense of humor who seem to survive.
|
| always the same: deterioration,
| |
| | How did such a quality ever evolve?With a
|
| destruction, and, in many cases,
| |
| | little serious thought, it should be at
|
| death.Does this coincide with what
| |
| | least somewhat obvious that the scenario
|
| evolutionists have been chewing our ears
| |
| | proposed by the theory of evolution does
|
| off with for years?For years we've been
| |
| | not work and certainly could never have
|
| hearing stories about how biological life
| |
| | occurred. One may even find it puzzling
|
| underwent billions of years of random
| |
| | how a concoction such as evolution could
|
| genetic changes. We've been hearing how
| |
| | ever have been accepted as science in the
|
| by accident some of these changes
| |
| | first place. I think that if evolution
|
| resulted in beneficial mutations. We've
| |
| | can be called science, there should be
|
| been hearing how these beneficial
| |
| | several other equally qualified
|
| mutations eventually resulted in new and
| |
| | scientific topics included in science
|
| more complex species. Yet when we look
| |
| | text books--the physics behind Superman's
|
| at what random genetic changes--or any
| |
| | X-ray vision, the story of how the power
|
| other random changes, for that
| |
| | of speech evolved in Mickey Mouse, and
|
| matter--actually do to biological life,
| |
| | the chemical composition of Batman's
|
| we find nothing but disease and death.
| |
| | Shark Repellent Spray. If we're going to
|
| Where are all those beneficial mutations
| |
| | have fun theories, let's really make them
|
| evolutionists have been talking about?
| |
| | fun.
|
| Not one patient has ever developed or
| |
| |
|
